Making A Difference


I often see on blogs, forums and MRA web sites if their really making a difference. If writing about men's issues is worth it. Here's one possible answer to those questions. it's a post from the International Mens Network.org I through that this one was important enough to rip off word for word, and my apologies to the original author but this is important:

The Tipping Point Of Male Tolerance


About ten or so years ago there was a field near my house where I used to walk my dog, and where my friends and I had played when we were children. It was sold for housing development and I heard the local council were listening to the local resident's views on it. There was the opportunity to sign a petition against development on this little field. I didn't sign it. It seemed like too much bother to sign it when surely they would just build it anyway.

They did build on it, a dreadful housing estate to provide cheap subsidised housing for people on welfare. Don't get me wrong, I have the utmost respect for those who are genuinely poor, but so many of these people whilst claiming poverty drive expensive cars and some deal drugs.

The crime rate in the area soared. Litter and graffiti in the area proliferated. But the worst thing of all was I found out later that they had only needed about two or three more signatures on the petition to stop building on the field. I vowed from then on to act upon things I didn't like.

Everything counts.
Even the smallest act can tip a situation from one outcome to a different one. There is always something you can do to improve a situation. Even if all seems hopeless and you are convinced that there's absolutely nothing you can do, just write down your frustrations in a letter, a diary or on an Internet page or discussion board. Record your frustration. Writing it down helps you feel better and it can empower you by communicating your frustration to others. The world doesn't give a damn about what you think or how you feel until the moment that you take action.



Your simple act could be the thing that helps tip the situation. It's amazing how suddenly situations can turn sometimes. In his book "The Tipping point," Malcolm Gladwell describes this as a scientific principle that reoccurs in all sorts of situations from viral epidemics to fashion trends to the spread of a new technology. The Internet and the fax machine were both around for decades before they suddenly took off, seemingly overnight. One small change, such as one extra person catching a virus, can suddenly spread the phenomenon exponentially.



This is of direct relevance to the men's movement. It's been a niche interest for the last decade. But for every one man whose actively involved in the movement there are at least a hundred who are pissed off enough to only require the slightest thing to turn them into men's movement activists. By which I mean simply a man who fights back against evil feminism, who answers back, who writes letters of complaint, who takes legal actions or rallies other men to the cause.



What kind of things could push him into action? For one, simply finding out that there is such a thing as a men's movement. Finding out that other men are fighting against this corrosive force could embolden him to act. Or, there are many other things that could push him into action such as loosing his kids, his job, being falsely accused of sexual harassment, etc.



From the point of female manipulators the male's weakest point is his tendency to give in, to let the woman go first, to be chivalrous, to "put up" with discomforts and inconvenience himself for the sake of women. It's expected of him. But what limits are there to this male chivalry?




Does a gentleman put up with laws that take his children away from him? Give his job to a less able person simply because she's a woman? Destroy his right to socialise in male-only clubs and lounges when women have the right to socialise in female-only ones? Is it chivalrous for a guy to simply accept that his sons will be less well educated at their school than the girls in their class? That he should get less benefits from paying taxes than women, and that his taxes should go towards paying for schemes that undermine him, his sons, his brothers, or his father?




Every man has his limit. Even the meekest, most obedient dog can turn on its master if it's beaten enough. And there are ever-growing crowds of Western men who have just about had enough.




And when enough factors have touched enough men to tip them into action, then there will be one big, vast, global tip. The whole movement itself will tip into public consciousness. It will appear to some people that this men's movement thing suddenly appeared overnight.




Overnight success is really just the result of years of preparation!




I don't know what will cause this tip of the men's movement into the public mind and into true influence. It may be something awful, like a famous man having his children taken away from him and committing suicide. Or, it may be a high-rating TV documentary, or politicians may push men's tolerance too far with some new law that suddenly creates mass demonstrations. I don't know what will cause the tipping point. But I do know that it almost definitely will occur very soon. It's like a storm gathering on the horizon.




Your actions now are paving the way for a huge ground-shift.
A cultural earthquake will inevitably hit Western countries in the very near future as collectively men start to stand up to the feminist onslaught against them.



It will grow in momentum.




It will generate more and more influence and media exposure, which will feedback and create yet more influence and media exposure.




It will create a critical mass of active consumers who may purchase magazines that cover men's issues or who might refuse to buy products and services that are promoted with misandric advertising.




And once the injustices against men are communicated aloud in public in the mass media, I would not want to be a feminist. Feminism will be blown out of the water. Its discrediting will be complete. At the moment there are probably more people who will defend feminist viewpoints in public than will attack them. But in two years or so that balance will flip, and that will create a huge difference in how men are treated.




Like a tree that's been germinating underground for sometime, the men's movement will suddenly emerge into daylight. And unlike the growth of feminism, the men's movement is not a hateful, destructive movement. The men who are taking action on these issues are largely productive, intelligent, clear-thinking individuals with a respect for the family and the needs of children and communities. Unlike feminists they do not seek to perpetuate a distorted view of history, destroy the family, grab jobs and power without working for them, or imprison people on false charges.




This is not some political or intellectual philosophy. It's simply an uprising of anger and frustration at genuinely unfair treatment. Every man has a limit to his tolerance, and men as a group also have a limit to what they'll accept. Pretty soon both these limits will max out. On that day we'll see the effects of the tipping point of male tolerance.

No corportation for you!

Norway's crazy leftist government is threating to close businesses that still don't meet their gender quota for hiring more women on January 1st, 2008. Here's the rest of the story:

Companies organized as "ASA" corporations are required to meet a state-mandated quota that calls for 40 percent of their directors to be women.

The quota was ushered in during the previous center-right government coalition, and has been enthusiastically embraced by the current Labour Party-led government.

Equality minister Karita Bekkemellem told newspaper Aftenposten on Friday that those companies failing to meet the quota will face involuntary dissolution from January 1. Many are within traditionally male-oriented branches like the offshore oil industry, shipping and finance.

"My advice to them is that they take responsibility and find the women they need," she said. She called the law "historic and radical," and said it will be enforced.


Five Dollar A Gallon Gas

It's highly likely since oil is hovering around the $90 mark. Consider getting yourself an electric vehicle.

Current Oil Prices can be found here:

http://money.cnn.com/data/commodities

The price as of right now is either $87 or $88 a barrel.

Former Lacrosse coach sues Duke

I found this nice little tidbit while surfing Mens News Daily. It's a story for the AP on Duke's continuing legal saga. This time it's their former Lacrosse coach that's...Well I let you read it..

CHAPEL HILL, N.C. - The former Duke University men's lacrosse coach who resigned last year amid allegations that three of his players raped a stripper has sued the university.

Mike Pressler's lawsuit apparently stems from a financial settlement the school reached earlier this year with him, although school officials did not give details Friday. The players were later cleared of the charges.

The Herald-Sun of Durham reported Friday on its Web site that his lawsuit alleges the university broke the terms of the confidential settlement when university senior vice president John Burness made disparaging comments about him.


Updating Site

Okay. I'm going to change the template now. If you see the site disappear or any error messages it means I'm in the process of trying to update the site. Hopefully it will work correctly after I'm done.

free image hosting by LargeImageHost.com

Illegal work while Americans dont

Sobering stats from Numbers USA:

Background: Some Americans and lawmakers make the common error to think that unemployment figures measure people without jobs. Rather, they measure only those people who are actively looking for jobs and have signed up with government unemployment agencies. The potential labor pool is far larger than the government reports because so many people are not in the labor market at all for the following reasons:

they were laid off and ran out of unemployment benefits;

they stopped work because of illness, injury, pregnancy and they didn't have enough incentive to look for a job or the jobs weren't attractive enough;

they failed to find a job for so long that they gave up; or

they are disabled (the vast majority of disabled American cannot get a job)


also on the sidebar of this page are the following stats:

14 million Americans are unable to find full-time jobs in the current economy.

There are 55,436,000 million Americans, ages 16-64, who are not in the labor force.

U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS). Labor Force Statistics from the Current Population Survey; July, 2007 BLS


Forty percent of working-age African-American men are unemployed.
BLS


Mind you these are just the numbers from the people that bother to register with the feds. (So it's much higher than that.)

and just a bit more from the bottom of the page:

There is some direct evidence that immigration has harmed less-educated natives; states with the largest increase in immigrants also saw larger declines in natives working; and in occupational categories that received the most new immigrants, native unemployment averages 10 percent.

Some of the occupations most impacted by immigration include maids, construction laborers, dishwashers, janitors, painters, cabbies, grounds keepers, and meat/poultry workers. The overwhelming majority of workers in these occupations are native-born.

It's a damn shame but yet it will continue as long as people keep putting the same clowns in office year after year..









Updating and stuff

Soon I will be doing a little updating of the web log and house cleaning but not
of the post. Those will stay. Until tomorrow night..

Marriage Stike Predictions On Target

This post from the archives of Pooks Mill:

Here is a fantastic article Newsweek did on the 'marriage crunch' way back in 1986. The article is full of great quotes and really reveals how some women think (such as one women deciding to buy a house instead of getting a husband to do it. So that is the purpose of husbands is to turn them into a house?). It also shows many women's panic over this article back then.


And on the MSNBC Site:

It was Valentine's Day when Sharon Makover learned of it on the news, and the irony did not elude her. "I thought, 'This is not what I want to be hearing today"." Having recently split up with one boyfriend, Makover was at a crossroads: should she throw herself into her career or commit to a new boyfriend living in another country? "It got me thinking about what I wanted to do with my life," says Makover, 26, a curatorial assistant at the Jewish Museum in New York. A month later she was engaged.

All things being equal, Los Angeles screenwriter Nancy Rigg would prefer having a husband. Nevertheless, the news infuriated her. "It reinforces an old myth that once you hit 30, you're over the hill," says Rigg, 36. "I imagine that women who are buying into this are pretty depressed right now. It was like Moses came down the mountain and said, 'Boo on you women"."

The traumatic news came buried in an arid demographic study titled, innocently enough, "Marriage Patterns in the United States." But the dire statistics confirmed what everybody suspected all along: that many women who seem to have it all—good looks and good jobs, advanced degrees and high salaries—will never have mates.



Compliment American Women and there will be a jail cell waiting for you.

This from Male Samizdat (link):


If you don't think men are targets of persecution in the United States, get a look at this:

Here's the link: Man Arrested After Telling Women They Were 'Extremely Beautiful'

Here's the story:


DENVER, CO -- A man who told two women they were extremely beautiful was arrested on charges of harassment last week, Denver police said. Police said 32-year-old Jeff John Hergert approached the women and "expressed interest in them." He told each woman in two separate incidents that they were extremely beautiful and that they should consider modeling. Hergert was arrested and is being held on two counts of harassment. He is being held on a $10,000 bond.




Here's the commentary:




What, you didn't think stuff like this would happen? It was only a matter of time before we moved from "sexual harassment in the workplace" to "adverting to women" being a crime. There are perverts everywhere, but the purpose of sexual harassment law is not to prevent sexual harassment. It is to give women a tool they can use arbitrarily use against men that cannot be easily countered.



So, this guy tells two women they are beautiful. That's a crime? It is now in the People's Republic of Femerica. I suppose, however, had he been a Brad Pitt-type loaded down with lots of cash, the women involved would have gotten money out of him the old fashioned way, i.e. golddigging via sex. (I suspect there's a lawsuit headed this guy's way.)



I recall a blog entry some time back from Duncan Idaho in the now-defunct Eternal Bachelor blog that UK women were complaining they didn't get enough compliments from men. It appears modern Western women are too stupid to realize that it is precisely this kind of environment that keep them from getting those compliments.



Just another nail in a coffin so full of nails it looks like a porcupine. Stay away from American women - in fact, all Western women. Do not talk to them. Ever. Learn from Mr. Hergert's experience. A jail cell is waiting for you.



I can see marriages now:



Wife: Honey, why don't you talk to me anymore?


Husband: (muttering) Don't wanna go to jail....

Wikipedia Going The Fem-o-nasty Way

For those of you reading this blog that have not been following events in the men's issues blogosphere several men friendly to the cause have been trying to get an entry posted to Wikipedia on Men Going Their Own Way. However, at each and every turn an administrator at Wikipedia has blocked efforts made by anyone to add our own terminology to thier site. Here's the story from Male Samizdat (link):


Wikipedia Going The Feminist Way


Posted: July 6th, 2007, 12:06am PDT by Male Samizdat

Here is the original call to battle by Fred X.

So much for Wikipedia's much-vaunted "NPOV" (neutral point of view) policy. It turns out Wikipedia actually has a "FPOV" (feminazi point of view) policy.

If you haven't heard yet, the article "MGTOW" (Men Going Their Own Way) has been repeatedly entered by men's rights advocates, and then deleted by feminazis and/or their mangina accomplices

For those who are new to this, MGTOW is the leaderless, distributed movement of men who are, each on their own, boycotting the poisonous, ubiquitous matriarchal culture. This is done mostly by refusing to socialize with Western skanks, but also by doing things like not engaging in the corporate rat race, not watching the vileness that is television and otherwise avoiding the mainstream media.

Apparently, someone is threatened by MGTOW. Might it be that feminists are afraid men will wake up and challenge their cultural and institutional hegemony? We all know what the effects of that have been - absolute cultural and social devastation. The truth is, however, feminist domination can only work as long as men consent to be co-opted by the fematrix.

The question is: will you allow yourself to be enslaved for the sake of the faint promise of occasional sex? If the answer is no, then you have taken the most important step in throwing off matriarchy.

The effort to get Wikipedia to reverse its decision is important. However, new men's rights blogs keep popping up. Wikipedia can keep us out of their world, but they can't shut us up.

Translate Page Into Your Language

Image Hosted by UploadHouse.com



Image Hosted by UploadHouse.com









del.icio.us linkroll

Archive

Counter

Counter

web tracker

Widget

Site Meter

Blog Patrol Counter