Top 10 Reasons To Stay Single

This article was found at No Marriage.com:

Men commit to staying single

By Adele Horin
June 27 2002

Not only are men averse to the idea of commitment, they can think of at least 10 good reasons to stay single.

A new study from the United States has identified the main barriers to men tying the knot.

Heading the list is their ability to get sex without marriage more easily than in the past. The second is that they can enjoy the benefits of having a wife by cohabiting rather than marrying.

The study, called "Why Men Won't Commit: Exploring Young Men's Attitudes about Sex, Dating and Marriage", was researched by the National Marriage Project at Rutgers University in New Jersey. It was based on focus groups with 60 unmarried heterosexual men aged 25 to 33, and is part of an annual report on the social health of marriage in America.


Released today, the report found that men were not against marriage itself.
They just were not in a hurry to get to the altar.


The report lends weight to remarks by Ross Cameron, the parliamentary secretary to the Minister for Family and Community Services, who last month chided Australian men, blaming Australia's looming fertility crisis on men's commitment phobia. "The principal reason young women say they don't get around to having children is they can't find a bloke they like who is willing to commit," he said. "This commitment aversion in the Australian male is a real problem."


A survey commissioned by Relationships Australia in 1998 found "fear of divorce and all that goes with it" topped the list of nine possible reasons for delaying marriage in Australia.


But the telephone survey of 1400 randomly selected people was not confined to eligible bachelors. It asked respondents why people would not get married in future.


Avoidance of commitment, fear of making a mistake, and bad previous experience were the next on the list.


The head of Relationships Australia, Anne Hollonds, said women also seemed less willing to commit. "We have raised a generation of young women who are less focused on having children and that lessens their commitment to partnering permanently."


She said society did not particularly encourage marriage; at the same time it encouraged people to focus on individual goals. "First comes the mortgage, then marriage comes if people decide to have children."


Top 10 reasons not to marry


1. Men can get sex without marriage.


2. They can enjoy the benefits of having a wife by cohabiting rather than marrying.


3. They want to avoid divorce and its financial risks.


4. They want to wait until they are older to have children.


5. They fear that marriage will require too many changes and compromises.


6. They are still waiting for the perfect soul mate, and she hasn't appeared yet.


7. They face few social pressures today to marry.


8. They are reluctant to marry a woman who already has children.


9. They want to own a house before they get a wife.

10. They want to enjoy single life for as long as they possibly can.

Forgien Bloggers Free Speech Endangered

This from the owner/editor of The Brussels Journal:

This morning the police came to my door again to question me about allegedly racist articles
on The Brussels Journal. I was not in. Tonight the local police phoned to “invite” me urgently
to the police station. In Belgium any leftist or totalitarianist can lodge a complaint against “internet racism” through a Belgian government website and the judiciary starts an investigation. Apparently someone in Ghent has lodged a complaint against this website. I am not allowed to know who this person is, but I am requested to come to the police station to be interrogated.

I told the officer that I refuse to justify my writings for anonymous complaints.
“I am not living in the Soviet Union,” I told him (though I fear I am).

As a matter of principle I will not go to the police station. I defend the freedom of the press, which implies the right of journalists not to be questioned by the authorities about articles and opinions that they write or edit. I told the officer that if the police wants to question me they will have to arrest me. The Belgian authorities are clearly intent on intimidating us and closing down this website.


and this from Iain Dale's Diary:

This country has a tradition of protecting free speech. It defends those whose views may offend. So the plight of Mr Inigo Wilson (pic) is one which should concern all those who cherish free speech. Inigo wrote a piece for ConservativeHome a few weeks ago in which he exposed "Leftyspeak". At the end of his article he compiled a Lexicon of Leftyspeak, which was slightly more entertaining than his original article. Before you read on, click HERE to read his article.

Guido has already written HERE about the Muslim Public Affairs Committee demanding that Wilson's employer, Orange, sack him. Orange have suspended Mr Wilson "pending an investigation", as Guido reports HERE. I should at this point explain that I do not know
Mr Wilson, have never met him, or to the best of my knowledge spoken to him.
But I am going to defend him.

I very much hope that Orange won't appease the self-styled Muslim Public Affairs Committee. Click HERE to see how they have whipped this up into something far bigger than it ever
should be.




Bullseye

Finally someone nails it on the head. In a post from an article at Men's News Daily entitled Feminism Is Why We Are So Delicate Pursuing the “Warm War” this post was made in the comments section:

Denis said,

I do not make a distinction between feminists. They are all degrees of supporting a hateful idealogy. I know some see some measure of support from feminists such as Wendy McElroy, Kate O’Beirne, Ariel Levy and others. Having the input of these different types of feminists whether gender feminists, independent feminists, equalitarian feminists, …whatever… ultimately results in the women taking the oxygen out of the discussion. The message by MRAs gets lost. The chatter of these women drowns out the issues for men because women are too busy advancing their issues (while some of their issues may appear pro-male).

They ALL support a hateful idealogy. At least some part of it that is important to them. A part where they want advantage for women at the expense of rights for men.

Say for example you were a German in Germany in the 1930s and 1940s and say you were a Nazi. Let’s say you joined out of idealism for a new Germany having been inspired by the writings and speeches of leaders in the Nazi Party. Let’s say also you were told about the mass deportations, the mass exterminations, etc.. When asked why you were a Nazi you answer: “Well, I’m not THAT kind of Nazi.” Maybe you call yourself an Independent Nazi, or an Equalitarian Nazi.

Would it matter? Are you not giving some measure of credibility to the actions of Nazi’s (including the attrocities) and to the movement called Nazism simply by being a relatively innocent person who calls themself a Nazi?

Until we make the word “feminism” as dirty as nazism and fascism our message will not get out fully. At times the message will go out from us, re-defined, into the media through a feminist lense.

At times we will get drawn into the chatter with the various factions of feminism always ending up as a discussion about women and their issues. e.g., the marriage strike will not be about injustice for men but rather about the loneliness of women, females pedophiles need to be understood (you know their bi-polar condition) while men simply accused of rape get also raped by the justice system and the media, where war is about the casualties of women and not the dead and wounded soldiers..




I also have this from Kitten News(link):




Feminism is but one arm of the great evil of Marxism. It is the sisterhood of that machine. The other arm is of course the brotherhood - the union movement, the Labour parties, the Democrats, the academics, the judiciary, the main stream media, and thousands of Marxist manginas acting out new metrosexual weirdness. Even many in the opposition parties such as Cameron in the UK Tories and Peter Costello here in the Australian Liberal party believe in furthering Marxist principles. They're all over the world like a cancer and they all want fathers out of families and they all want women in the workforce and they all want your children in their brainwashing facilities called childcare centres, pre-schools, schools and universities where they can control the thinking of the next generations - they hope.

They've rewritten the history books, they've changed learning syllabuses, they dumbed down boys and they promoted girls to re-engineer society to suit the ideology of Karl Marx (link) and to dis-empower free thinking men - their only serious enemy.


So stop blaming feminism alone for your angst and miseries and start seeing the big picture.


The personal is political.


And don't go thinking that Republicans, Tories, other conservatives or other pro-capitalistic politicians will help you out of this war against men, because they won't. They're happy to bust up families too, just like the Marxists, so they can have women creating a big pool of cheap labour for their capitalist bosses. They know women with children are happy to work in trashy part-time jobs for low wages and they know that that keeps their big capitalist overlords very happy.


Western governments care only about big business, big unions and big government. You, your wife and your kids are nothing more to them than just slaves to keep their money and power systems running. They couldn't care less what happens to you.


I know some of you do understand, but I have to keep writing this same stuff, because it seems that so many of you just can't grasp the entire message in one go. So keep thinking about it - just don't take too long. And start getting active about getting rid of these creeps like this Johnston here, who wants to change your life to suit himself, his whacky ideology and his power ambitions.


If you don't do it for yourself, then please do it for your kids....




Alien Nation

Here's something that might be worth ordering it's the May 2006 edition of Whistle Blower Magazine:

May 2006 – ALIEN NATION: Secrets of the Invasion – Why America's government invites rampant illegal immigration

Did you know that radical immigrant groups [Mexicommies] – including the League of United Latin American Citizens (LULAC), the Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund (MALDEF), the Movimiento Estudiantil Chicano de Aztlan (MEChA) and the National Council of La Raza (La Raza) – not only share a revolutionary agenda of conquering America's southwest, but they also share common funding sources, notably the Ford and Rockefeller foundations?



War on Dads

This article was orginally linked from Cool Tools 4 Men it's from
World Net Daily:

WHISTLEBLOWER MAGAZINE
THE WAR ON FATHERS

How the 'feminization of America'
destroys boys, men – and women
Posted: June 26, 2006
1:00 a.m. Eastern

© 2006 WorldNetDaily.com

The June edition of WND's popular Whistleblower magazine is a mega-eye-opener exploring one of the most crucial but little-reported phenomena of modern America – what WND calls
"THE WAR ON FATHERS."

CULTURE: Fifty years ago, "Father knows best" was a hit TV show, in which insurance agent Jim Anderson (actor Robert Young) would come home from work each evening, trade his sport jacket for a nice, comfortable sweater, and then deal with the everyday growing-up problems of his family. He could always be counted on to resolve that week's crisis with a combination of kindness, fatherly strength and common sense.

Today, television virtually always portrays husbands as bumbling losers or contemptible, self-absorbed egomaniacs. Whether in dramas, comedies or commercials, the patriarchy is dead, at least on TV where men are fools – unless of course they're gay. On "Queer Eye for the Straight Guy," the "fab five" are supremely knowledgeable on all things hip, their life's highest purpose being to help those less fortunate than themselves – that is, straight men – to become cool.

As this issue of Whistleblower shows, experts like Ph.D. scholar Christina Hoff Sommers, author of "The War Against Boys," agree: "It's a bad time to be a boy in America." Sommers provides example after example of what can only be called an all-out anti-male campaign:


"The carnage committed by two boys in Littleton, Colorado," declares the Congressional Quarterly Researcher, "has forced the nation to reexamine the nature of boyhood in America." William Pollack, director of the Center for Men at McLean Hospital and author of the best-selling "Real Boys: Rescuing Our Sons from the Myths of Boyhood," tells audiences around the country, "The boys in Littleton are the tip of the iceberg. And the iceberg is all boys."

In fact, Sommers reveals, it has become fashionable in elitist circles to conspire to change boys' very identity:

There are now conferences, workshops, and institutes dedicated to transforming boys. Carol Gilligan, professor of gender studies at Harvard Graduate School of Education, writes of the problem of "boys' masculinity … in a patriarchal social order." Barney Brawer, director of the Boys' Project at Tufts University, told Education Week: "We've deconstructed the old version of manhood, but we've not [yet] constructed a new version." In the spring of 2000, the Boys' Project at Tufts offered five workshops on "reinventing Boyhood." The planners promised emotionally exciting sessions: "We'll laugh and cry, argue and agree, reclaim and sustain the best parts of the culture of boys and men, while figuring out how to change the terrible parts."

"Terrible"? As this edition of Whistleblower shows, there is nothing wrong – and a very great deal right – with boys and masculinity. As maverick feminist Camille Paglia courageously reminds her men-hating colleagues, masculinity is "the most creative cultural force in history."

Demonrats Show Their Ture Colors

Bet you never heard  this story about the 2000 Demonratic National 
Convention:

The official opening of the 2000 Democratic convention included a flag ceremony, with a Posting of the Colors. This ceremony was conducted by an Honor Guard composed of Eagle Scouts from the Boy Scouts of America. Young men, invited by the event organizers, in full uniform, proudly carrying the flag of the United States. They had every right to expect a respectful acknowledgment of the appearance of their country’s flag on the stage, with an appropriate response from the conventioneers.

They had every right to expect that, but that is not what happened. Rather than doffing the sometimes silly headgear often seen at conventions, and having the audience rise to salute this symbol of our nation, the
Democratic conventioneers rose to issue a chorus of boos, with accompanying inappropriate hand gestures. Boos, hisses, hastily written inappropriate signs and hateful comments are what greeted these young people. Not by just a few, but by a majority of the attendees in the hall.


To their credit, the Scouts ignored this response, and concluded the ceremony with dignity. Not so the Democrats, who continued their display even after the Scouts left the stage. None of this ever made the mainstream news. While that does not surprise me, it has left me with some questions that I have not been able to satisfactorily answer.




 

The Unconstitutional VAWA

The VAWA first from a blog at Mens News Daily:

Ironically, curbing workplace violence against women was the initial push behind VAWA. That rational allowed VAWA to be passed under the Interstate Commerce Act, which provides federal funding and oversight in overcoming obstacles to interstate trade.

When the multibillion-dollar VAWA was first passed in 1994 under President Bill Clinton, critics pointed out that relatively few women experienced job-related “assaults and violent acts,” a key category used in arguing for federal protection under the commerce act. In fact, only about 2 percent of all assaults and violent acts involved women. Incidents in this category include “violence by persons, self- inflicted injury and assaults by animals.” The figure remains about the same today.

and an article located at Human Events Online:

Violence Against Women Act Abuses Rights of Men
by Phyllis Schlafly
Posted May 15, 2006

In January, President George W. Bush signed the reauthorization of the Violence Against Women Act without public debate, even though evidence has surfaced that Congress should have examined before the law was extended.

The act, which costs nearly $1 billion per year, is one of the major ways former President Bill Clinton bought the support of radical feminists.


Why Republicans passed this bill is a mystery. It's unlikely that the feminists who will spend all that money will ever vote Republican.

Passage of the Violence Against Women Act was a major priority of the American Bar Association for whose members it is a cash cow. More than 300 courts have implemented specialized docket processes to address the cases stemming from the act, more than 1 million women have obtained protection orders from the courts, and more than 660 new state laws pertaining to domestic violence have been passed, all of which produce profitable work for lawyers.



A recently issued ABA document called "Tool for Attorneys" provides lawyers with a list of suggestive questions to encourage their clients to make domestic-violence charges. Knowing that a woman can get a restraining order against the father of her children in an ex parte proceeding without any evidence, and that she will never be punished for lying, domestic-violence accusations have become a major tactic for securing sole child custody.



Voluminous documentation to dispel the feminist myths that created and have perpetuated the act are spelled out in seven reports just issued by an organization called Respecting Accuracy in Domestic Abuse Reporting, or RADAR, and in an 80-page report called "Family Violence in America" published by the American Coalition for Fathers & Children.

For example, it is a shocker to discover that acts don't have to be violent to be punished under the definition of domestic violence. Name-calling, put-downs, shouting, negative looks or gestures, ignoring opinions, or constant criticizing can all be legally labeled domestic violence.


The only web site so far to openly question the constitutionality of the VAWA has been Men's News Daily. Hopefuly I can dig up more information about this piece of legislation and whether if it is indeed unconstitutional...








 

Gender Problems

This story comes from the Cool Tools 4 Men Blog:

Battle of the sexes leaves men groping for equality
By Leo Lewis in Tokyo
July 24, 2006

What started as a desperate measure to protect women from gropers on trains has blossomed into a fully fledged movement. Single-sex places have become a lifestyle choice for many women and a source of outrage for men.

Once women-only carriages became standard on many Japan Railways services and the Tokyo Metro, other businesses quickly followed. Spas and gyms were among the first to pick up the trend, with restaurants, comic-book cafés and convenience stores joining the no-men-allowed movement.

Hotels, apartment blocks and pachinko gambling parlours are experimenting, and restaurants that do not exclude men have taken to giving free desserts to women.

The “women only" trend flies in the face of a massive government effort to put Japanese men and women closer together. Facing tumbling birth rates and a potential demographic crisis, the Government has tried to promote marriage matchmakers and encouraged companies to give staff time off for dating.


“If men want not to be discriminated against, they should have better manners,” Ms Suzuki said. “They sit so they take up lots of space, read newspapers wide open, leaf through pornography in public and some are really arrogant, too.”

Takashi Naito, the male owner of Men-Ya Sora, said: “I wanted to have as many repeat customers as possible and I noticed that female diners often asked me to give them a table away from men who were drunk and noisy.”

another story via al-Reuters:

Women applaud no-men, pink-striped metro cars
Tue Apr 25, 2006 8:17am ET

RIO DE JANEIRO, Brazil (Reuters) - Women commuters filled female-only, pink-striped subway cars in the Brazilian city of Rio de Janeiro on Monday on the first day of a scheme to avert groping and other unwanted sexual advances.

A law passed by the state legislature and signed by Rio Gov. Rosinha Matheus last month obliged the underground Metro and above-ground railways to have separate passenger cars for women during the weekday rush hours.

"It's the first day today and we had women applauding when men, who had entered their carriage without knowing about the rule, got off," a spokeswoman for the private Metro Rio company said.

Frequent complaints from women commuters about sexual harassment in crowded railway cars had prompted state legislators to pass the bill.

One car in every of Metro Rio's 33 trains is marked with pink stripes on doors and windows. The company said female passengers would themselves control men's entry into the cars, seeking the help of security guards if necessary.

Railroad company Supervia, which serves Rio and its suburbs, identifies its female-only cars with signs similar to those on women's restrooms.

Men won't be barred from the female-only cars during an initial phase but after that railroad police would enforce the new rule, a Supervia spokesman said.

Rio joins Tokyo and Mexico City as major cities that provide female-only train cars.

Scientist Grow Female Eggs In Lab

Sex war officially over - almost
Max Ponti

A story in the news today - In Laboratory, Ordinary Cells Are Turned Into Eggs. It's about the work of a couple of scientists, who have just changed the very face and soul of human reproduction - the basis of gender wars, the fundamentals of sexism and the very core foundation of feminism itself - forever.

Yes, feminism's foundations have just been cracked wide open. You see, their one big claim to fame as women has just evaporated. It's gone! Poof! Just like that! This claim has always been based on a bizarre female assumption, that as egg bearers of the human species they were a more important sex than men. They believed that because each man can produce enormous fountains of sperm, the liquid of life, that he, along with most men - in fact Germaine Greer stated 99.9% of all men - were expendable and "surplus to requirements".

They fancied, that because just one man's gusher could service the reproductive needs of literally millions of women, or so they thought and earnestly believed, that by comparison with their limited egg production, that made them, women, special creatures worthy of awe, adoration and privilege. Their special eggs made them special. This, they believed, made them the elite sex.

Well, after having read the story, it turns out that scientific experimentation with simple ordinary stem cells, male or female, and a little know how, can now easily grow eggs from just any old body, including men. So women and their precious eggs just became as un-special as they've been claiming men have been all the time and now there's a potentially never ending supply of human eggs.


 

An eBook on the Massachusetts Family Court System

A link to this  ebook was posted at Cool Tools 4 Men:

EXPOSING THE CORRUPTION IN THE MASSACHUSETTS FAMILY COURTS
by Kevin Thompson

Description:


I am just one of the thousands of fathers who have been victimized by the system of organized crime in the Massachusetts family courts. This book exposes the motives, tactics, and hypocrisy that all fathers must endure. The book also details my specific case including the "spin off" corruption that resulted from my efforts to hold the racketeers in and outside of this kangaroo court system accountable. The book has been "banned" in Massachusetts for five months now by a judge who is criticized in the book and who banned it without ever "officially" opening it since the book was not submitted into evidence by the moving party. This illegal order, which confirms the claim made in my book that constitutional law does not apply to fathers in family court, has been temporarily lifted. Since the availability of this book could change at any moment, I encourage you to purchase it while you still can.



 

Yet more domestic violence

Again via Kitten News:
 
Woman charged in husband's stabbing

BOARDMAN — Police arrested a 21-year-old West Boulevard woman accused of stabbing her husband in the buttocks with a kitchen knife.

Casey Jackson was charged with felonious assault and is scheduled to appear in Mahoning County Court here Tuesday. She was released from the Mahoning County Justice Center on a $12,000 bond.

Police were called to a West Boulevard apartment about 9:30 a.m. Thursday. They found her husband, Joethan Jackson, 21, lying on the living room floor, holding his side, and a puddle of blood on the carpet.

Joethan Jackson told police that he and his wife had gotten into an argument and she smacked his face. He said that he pushed her onto the couch to avoid being hit. She ran into the kitchen, grabbed something and ran back to the living room, he said.

As he was walking away, he felt a poke to the right side of his buttocks, looked back and saw his wife with a knife in her hand, he told police. The man then went into the bedroom to get dressed. He was naked when the assault occurred, a police report said.

and this:

Woman charged with trying to burn ex-husband's home
By DAVID BALL

LUMBERTON A Silsbee woman was arrested for setting fire to a Lumberton home on Tuesday, July 11, according Hardin County Sheriff Ed Cain.

Linda Faulk, 49, is accused of using a Bic lighter to set fire to a shutter at the residence of her
ex-husband, Ricky Devillier, who lives on Orchid Street in Lumberton.

Faulk had just been released on bond from Orange County on a charge of arson when she allegedly committed the crime in Lumberton. She is also under investigation for arson by law enforcement agencies in mid-Jefferson County.

She was charged with arson of a habitation and released from the Hardin County Jail the same day after posting a $20,000 bond.

and this:

Man Dies After Fight With Ex, Another Man
Alleged Intruder Stabbed To Death


POSTED: 12:38 pm EDT August 15, 2006
UPDATED: 12:46 pm EDT August 15, 2006

UNION TOWNSHIP, Pa. -- A man is dead after a confrontation with his ex-girlfriend and her new boyfriend in Washington County.

Police said the fight began at a home in Union Township Monday night between Shawn Gildea, of Bethel Park, and his ex-girlfriend 31-year-old Christine Limbers.

Police said Gildea arrived at the home of Berry James on McChain Court Road in Union Township around 11 p.m. – a home that Limbers now shares with her current
boyfriend, James.

A verbal confrontation escalated and Gildea pushed a window air conditioner into the
home to gain entry, police said.



EU the New USSR?

This from the Brussels Journal:

Former Soviet Dissident Warns For EU Dictatorship
From the desk of Paul Belien on Mon, 2006-02-27 21:13

Vladimir Bukovksy, the 63-year old former Soviet dissident, fears that the European Union is on its way to becoming another Soviet Union. In a speech he delivered in Brussels last week Mr Bukovsky called the EU a “monster” that must be destroyed, the sooner the better, before it develops into a fullfledged totalitarian state.

Mr Bukovsky paid a visit to the European Parliament on Thursday at the invitation of Fidesz, the Hungarian Civic Forum. Fidesz, a member of the European Christian Democrat group, had invited the former Soviet dissident over from England, where he lives, on the occasion of this year’s 50th anniversary of the 1956 Hungarian Uprising. After his morning meeting with the Hungarians, Mr Bukovsky gave an afternoon speech in a Polish restaurant in the Trier straat, opposite the European Parliament, where he spoke at the invitation of the United Kingdom Independence Party, of which he is a patron.


An interview with Vladimir Bukovsky about the impending EUSSRIn his speech Mr Bukovsky referred to confidential documents from secret Soviet files which he was allowed to read in 1992. These documents confirm the existence of a “conspiracy” to turn the European Union into a socialist organization.



Woman kills husband with hot oil

Coast woman charged with dumping hot oil on husband faces murder charge

Associated Press

BAY ST. LOUIS, Miss. - A Hancock County woman who allegedly dumped a pot of heated cooking oil on her sleeping husband last month is now facing murder charges.

Investigators said Edna May Sanders, 45, whose maiden name is Miller, fled the couple's home with their two children after allegedly dumping a pot of hot grease on her husband, leaving him with third-degree burns on more than half of his body.

Sherman Sanders spent a week in the burn center at the University of South Alabama in Mobile. After his death Friday, county investigators intensified the search for his wife.

Authorities said the two were married only a short time.

"She has family in Texas and Louisiana and that's where we are concentrating all our efforts right now," said Kenny Hurt, the county's chief investigator.

Police believe Edna Sanders heated about two quarts of household cooking oil on the stove and allowed the grease to reach a simmer while her husband slipped into a sound sleep. Then, she poured the smoldering grease over his head, face, chest and arms.

"I've been in law enforcement 14 years and that was the worse thing I've ever seen," Hancock County Sheriff's Department investigator Ricky Fayard said after the July 28 attack. "His skin was dripping off of him."

"When we got there he was in bad shape. His entire hand, the skin came off, and it looked like a glove," Fayard said.



 

Democratic Party New Ploy

This from Canda Free Press:

For too many years, the Democratic Party has taken the black vote for granted. They have kept African-Americans in the fold by championing affirmative action and government programs which are supposed to be helping blacks achieve economic parity. However, they ignored the fact that a number of African-Americans might care more about the Bible than about welfare benefits…more about preserving the sanctity of marriage than about protecting the planet from big business.

For decades, the black family has been under attack from incompetent public officials who attempted to make blacks beholden to the federal government through government subsidies and positions on the public payroll. After all, if you delivered the promise of a job during a campaign, you naturally have an easier time winning the job-seeker’s vote at election time. But all those government giveaways and public jobs add up, resulting in bloated budgets, sky-high deficits, and extreme taxation. And many blacks are coming to realize that Uncle Sam is giving with one hand and taking away with the other, causing them to teeter on the brink of poverty.

What’s more, the federal government’s abortion policy has decimated the African-American population. While blacks make up only about 12 percent of the population, they account for more than 40 percent of abortions.

Isn’t it ironic that Democrats would push to abort future taxpayers who might also be future Democrats?



 

Australian Personal Safety Survey

From Kitten News:

"It's no wonder that feminists, the government and the mainstream media in Australia have been so quiet about the release of this new survey. It exposes a huge raft of feminist baloney,
lies and deceptions."


You can tell that the feminists and their allies are still reeling from the news. Even the Office for Women, who commissioned the thing haven't put up anything on their website about it yet and it's been nearly a week since it was released. Also, news stories about it - and all the major daily papers here in Australia ran a page about it - have even begun disappearing from Google News. It's almost as if they've taken those pages down.

The survey in question is located here:

Australian Bureau of Statistics
Personal Safety Survey


 

Translate Page Into Your Language

Image Hosted by UploadHouse.com



Image Hosted by UploadHouse.com









del.icio.us linkroll

Archive

Counter

Counter

web tracker

Widget

Site Meter

Blog Patrol Counter