U Not Gonna Like This

This post again from soc.men newsgroup:

Seven lesbians charged in straight man's stabbing
Monday, August 21, 2006 / 11:16 AM

SUMMARY: A N.Y. street vendor is hospitalized in critical condition
after putting unwanted moves on a lesbian out on the town with six
friends, police say.

Seven lesbians from Newark, N.J., attacked and seriously injured a
street vendor in New York's West Village early Friday after the man
grew angry when his advances to one woman were not returned, the New
York Daily News reported.

Police said the women whipped Wayne Buckle, 28, with belts; the
subject of his attentions, Patreese Johnson, 19, then stabbed him
repeatedly with a steak knife, the Daily News said.

One of the women yelled "She's my girl, and no one hits on my girl!"
during the incident, a police source told the paper.

"He made the mistake of spitting at one of them," Diego Rodriguez, who
works at a nearby newsstand and called 911, told the paper. "They beat
him up bad with belts, kicked and punched him."

Later, at the police station house, where the seven suspects, ranging
in age from 18 to 31, were charged with gang assault and criminal
possession of a weapon, another woman told the Daily News that Buckle
"called us [homophobic slur] and he said he was going to f--- us all."

Said another: "He spit on us and threw a cigarette. This is a hate
crime."

Buckle was recovering at a New York hospital in critical but stable
condition. (The Advocate)

A little humor foun at the soc.men newsgroup. WARNING: The post below contains some adult language.

Men's Studies (MS101) -- Final Exam May 2006
Instructions: Answer all questions

1. Women demand equality, but insist on seperate competition in the
Olympics:

a) Explain why the best women's football team in the world wouldn't
stand a chance against you and ten of your friends.

b) Explain why women cannot kick a ball straight.

c) Explain why their presence is only needed after the game,
particularly a night game.

2. Pamela Anderson's tits are plastic but look good in photographs.
Compare and contrast the relative merits of plastic and real tits.

3. It is long established that fat women are grateful when you give them
the big one. Outline some of the reasons why this is so and explain why
all feminists are fat and ugly lesbians.

4. Situation: Assume you are dating a girl who has five sisters, no
brothers, and no father. Explain why, when visiting, you leaving the
toilet seat up is the ultimate insult.

5. Write a critique or two of the following films that were viewed in
class:

a) Sweet Sins of Sexy Suzie
b) Three Into One Will Go
c) King Dong
d) Lezbo Lust
6. Women demand equality:

a) Why is it that when you buy a woman flowers or pay for dinner, she
and all her friends call you a gentleman?

b) Why is it that when you ask her and her friends why she never buys
you flowers or why she never pays for dinner, they call you a woman
hater?

7.Women drivers! Discuss.

8. Women demand equality:

a)Why is it that fee to enter a favorite bar on Friday night is $15 for
men but $5 for women?

b)Why is it that no man has challenged this in court?

c)Why is it if the opposite were true 435,000 feminazis would hold a
candle light prayer service in front of the bar to cast a spell on the
bar's karma?

9. Name something a woman has invented - ever.

10. Women demand equality:

a) On average, women live 7 years longer than men yet get their
pensions 5 years earlier. Explain why this isn't fair. Also make
reference to your bitchy and lazy grandmother who lived to be 104 and
your poor grandfather who worked since he was 13 yrs. old in a coal
mine only to die one day before he retired.

11. Describe an experiment to impress a girl by lighting a fart. Detail how
your food intake 4 hrs. before the experiment affects the colour of the
flame.

---end of examinaton---
When completed, you may leave the examination room. Then, get a job,
get married, have kids, work 54 hrs/wk at a job that you barely
tolerate because it pays bucks, buy a house (also known as mortgage)
then prepare yourself to die at age 48 from heart disease caused by
stress. Remember that your wife will live until she 85, so ensure your
life insurance premiums yield a hefty payout for her, so that she can
have a 2nd home in Florida and an occassional world cruise with her
other widowed girlfriends. Or, if you prefer, don't get married, but
find an attractive and polite girl in your class who you are certain in
9 years will be fat and bitchy, and just buy her a house.

This post from soc.men via Google Groups:

Straight girls look to gays for a little fun
By GEOFF BOTTING

For decades, the Shinjuku Ni-chome district in Tokyo has been the place for
gay men to go barhopping, mingle and find new friends.

In the last few months, however, the patrons have found themselves jostling
for elbow space at bar counters with a new breed of customer -- straight
women.

The district, reputedly Asia's biggest gay hangout, has long had its fair
share of female "tourists" who drop into the bars just for the fun it. But
the latest female arrivals are different; they're bona fide denizens.
Why do they come? Primarily to purchase the services of urisen, Japanese
slang for male prostitutes, according to Spa! (Aug. 15-22).

To clarify exactly who these women are and what kind of shenanigans they get
up to, the magazine dispatches nonfiction writer Ayumi Sakai, who admits to
hiring a gay man in the past, and Nameko Shinsan, a manga artist, to venture
into an urisen bar.

"I'm surprised that so many of the guys are so good looking. And there's no
trace of dimly lit sleaze about the place," says Shinsan, who is on her
first trip to such an establishment.

On this night, there are three male customers, aged from around 30 to 50,
plus two women. The numbers may be low, but the gender ratio is not unusual
for urisen bars these days, according to Sakai. "Usually the customer ratio
is around 60 percent men and 40 percent women," she says.

One of the female customers is a 32-year-old housewife named Saki, who has
been patronizing urisen bars for the past six months. She has no children
and her husband works in an accounting firm.

"My husband thinks it's OK to buy these urisen boys," she tells the other
women, after explaining that the couple has an open and very liberal
relationship.

And why the preference for young gay men, instead of, say, hosts? "Because
hosts reek of alcohol and their skin is leathery," she giggles.

More importantly, though, she appreciates the more laid-back style of gay
bars as opposed to host bars. "I was surprised when I first went to an
urisen bar. Although there were a lot of guys, none of them were trying to
push themselves onto me."

The other female customer is Emi, who's 26 and works as a secretary at a
foreign-owned pharmaceutical company. Emi has a boyfriend, with whom she has
sex only about once every two months. Even so, sex isn't the prime reason
for cavorting with gay men.

"Mostly, it's due to stress from work," she explains. "My work schedule
doesn't mesh well with my boyfriend's, and even when we do meet, I'm really
tired and go right off to sleep."

Perhaps Japan's most famous urisen patron is Usagi Nakamura, a 48-year-old
celebrity writer. In Shincho 45 (August), she relates a couple of attempts
at hiring and having sex with guys half her age whom she'd encountered in
Ni-chome.

Both experiences were a disaster. The first guy couldn't perform, blaming it
on the copious amount of beer he'd consumed that night. The second stud
needed a few lessons in either sincerity or the dramatic arts.

" 'Oooh, that feels sooo good. You are really great!' he told me. That corny
performance just made me bitter," Nakamura complains.

But in that respect, Nakamura may have been a rare case. Like Emi, most of
the female patrons of urisen bars never get around to having sex with the
men they hire, according to Spa!

Part of the reason is that the women are seeking merely companionship, while
another is that they're reluctant to disclose to a bar's management or its
workers that they're looking for sex.

Still, when sex doesn't happen, a young guy can be useful to a woman in
need. "I guess they'd be handy to have around if you were moving house,"
quips Shinsai.

The graphic above is a screenshot from the House Resources Committee ANWR website.




The graphic below shows how many billions of barrels of oil per region that are now trapped below American soil thanks to liberals.

That from Men's News Daily:

August 18, 2006
By John Lillpop

An inconvenient fact–America’s inability to free itself from dependence on oil from the Middle East is likely to go down as one of the greatest failures in U.S. political history. Even the most generous historian will find it difficult to justify our continued reliance on a region of the world that has been in constant turmoil for more than 50 years.

Given the political instability in the Middle East and the skyrocketing costs of oil, U.S. leaders should be working around the clock to make America truly energy independent.

Unfortunately, the Democrat Party is adamantly opposed to any measures that would increase the supply of this precious commodity.

Why is that the case?

Because environmental elitists like Al Gore have decided that average Americans should not drive automobiles. In Gore’s warped vision, the unwashed masses can damn well walk, skateboard, bike, hike, or preferably, not navigate at all. Except when headed to the polls to vote for Democrats, of course.

Mind you, “Limousine Liberals” like Gore, the Clintons, John Kerry, et al. will always have their SUVs, stretch limousines, private jets, and the like. It’s elitist, liberal arrogance gone mad!

In advancing their no-combustion engine agenda, liberals obviously exacerbate the energy crisis by toiling 24/7 to do the following:

* Obstruct all oil drilling

* Obstruct added refinery capacity via extreme environmental regulations

* Obstruct nuclear energy and other reasonable alternative energy sources

* Tax “windfall profits,” and implement other anti-business steps that stifle efforts to increase oil supply.

An earlier article from the Heritage Foundation:

New Politics

Objections to drilling in ANWR, mostly from environmentalists, have stymied efforts to open up the refuge ever since a 1980 change in federal law allowed for oil and gas exploration there. At the time, Alaskans were under the impression that production would start soon. Sen. Ted Stevens (R-AK), who recently toured the remote North Alaska site, said that for “24 years I’ve argued to get Congress to keep its word to us.”

Over the last four years, the only holdup has been in the Senate. The most recent version of the Senate energy bill, which fell two votes shy of breaking a Democratic filibuster, did not even contain ANWR provisions. The Senate had voted 52-48 to keep ANWR out of the bill entirely.


This recent article from the Heritage Foundation:

Oil and gasoline prices remain high, and two wars raging in the Middle East could drive prices up further still. Yet Congress has failed to remove restrictions on oil drilling in Alaska’s Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR). ANWR is America’s single largest untapped source of oil. A new bill, the American-Made Energy Freedom Act (H.R. 5890), would open it to energy production. Other provisions in the bill are problematic, particularly those that would use the billions in ANWR leasing and royalty revenues to fund alternative energy projects.

A Stalemate on ANWR
In times of high prices and turmoil in many oil-exporting nations, America should make good use of the oil available here at home. Indeed, both the House and Senate have supported opening ANWR many times before, but they have failed to do so in the same bill. The House has been more aggressive, repeatedly passing legislation opening up a portion of ANWR’s coastal plain to exploration and drilling. Each time, however, the Senate was unable to overcome filibusters to companion bills. In turn, the Senate successfully included ANWR provisions in budget legislation, a useful tactic because that legislation is not subject to a filibuster. However, the House has thus far failed to go along with this approach.

The frustrating bottom line is that ANWR oil is still off-limits.

and this from the ANWR Action Blog:

How much oil lies beneath the Coastal Plain of ANWR?

Not much according to radical environmentalists and their friends in Congress. They say it’s not worth opening 2000 acres of the nearly 20 million-acre refuge for “just six months worth of oil.” “It would only be a drop in the bucket,” they say.

Well, fiction can be fun, but I prefer the reference section – especially when discussing our nation’s energy policy and growing dependence on foreign oil.

ANWR opponents’ claims about ANWR oil are shamelessly contrived. They deliberately ignore the abundance of scientific evidence developed over the years to support the presence of vast reserves, and play with statistics from the U.S. Geological Survey’s 1998 ANWR study until they arrive at a useful number. ANWR opponents then state their “findings” on record in debates in the House and Senate, blatantly misleading Americans into believing there is little oil in ANWR. In short, they butcher the objective science of math, ignore the rules of ethics, and ruin the integrity of any debate on ANWR.

Here’s a non-biased, mathematically sound and ethically produced analysis of the amount of American oil we can get from ANWR, followed by an updated assessment based on today’s oil prices and current recovery rates.

The following are mean estimates from the 1998 U.S. Geological Survey report, Potential Oil Production from the Coastal Plain of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge:

Oil in Place: 27.8 billion barrels

Technically Recoverable Oil: 10.32 billion barrels ** Assumes a recovery rate of 37%

Economically Recoverable Oil: 8.15 billion barrels **Assumes an average price of $30/barrel

So, given the mean estimates, and the assumptions of a 1990s recovery rate of 37% and an average price of $30 per barrel, the amount of oil that could be both technically and economically produced is 8.15 billion barrels.

Common sense dictates that at today’s prices of $70 per barrel, every last drop of the 10.3 billion barrels of technically recoverable oil could be economically recovered.

But don’t take it from me, take it from the Chief Economist at the American Petroleum Institute, John C. Felmy: “If you look at the geological survey, they say there’s 10 billion barrels as a mean estimate…. Recovery of that, at today’s prices is probably going to be 100 percent… That makes it the second largest deposit we’ve ever had in this country,” capable of producing about 1 million barrels per day over at least 30 years

and the ever popular energy alternatives always promoted by liberals:

Safe production on just 2000 acres of ANWR, 0.01 percent of the area, will yield more than 1 million barrels of oil a day for nearly 30 years.

• To get the equivalent amount of energy from wind, we would need a 3.7 million acre wind farm (that’s the size of Rhode Island and Connecticut combined) AND gale-force winds 365 days a year, every year, for more than 30 years.

• To get the equivalent amount of energy from solar power, we would need a 448,000 acre solar panel expanse AND beach-worthy, sun-shiny days 365 days a year, every year, for 30 years. (Paul K. Driessen, Atlas Economic Research Foundation)

So there you have it. The REAL FACTS behind ANWR and the current oil crisis.

From Dissecting Leftism:

“All the worth which the human being possesses, all spiritual reality, he possesses only through the State.” — 19th century German philosopher Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel. Hegel is the most influential philosopher of the Left — inspiring Karl Marx, the American “Progressives” of the early 20th century and university socialists to this day.

The Big Lie of the late 20th century was that Nazism was Rightist. It was in fact typical of the Leftism of its day. It was only to the Right of Stalin’s Communism. The very word “Nazi” is a German abbreviation for “National Socialist” (Nationalsozialistisch)

also from a webpage that contains one of Dr. John J. Ray's articles:

MODERN LEFTISM AS RECYCLED FASCISM

By: John J. Ray (M.A.; Ph.D.)

Mussolini's own summary of the Fascist philosophy: "Tutto nello Stato, niente al di fuori dello Stato, nulla contro lo Stato" (Everything in the State, nothing outside the State, nothing against the State)

A Leftist prophet

The ideas of Benito Mussolini (1883-1945), the founder of Fascism, are remarkably similar to the ideas of modern-day Western Leftists. If Mussolini was not the direct teacher of modern-day Leftists, he was certainly a major predecessor. What Leftists advocate today is not, of course, totally identical with what Mussolini was advocating and doing 60 to 80 years ago in Italy but there are nonetheless extensive and surprising parallels. Early in the 20th century, he prophesied that the 20th century would be the century of Fascism and he got that right in that most of his ideas are still preached by the modern-day Left.

The popular view

Popular encyclopedias such as Funk & Wagnalls (1983) lump together Hitler's German regime, Mussolini's Italian regime, General Tojo's Japanese regime and Generalissimo Franco's Spanish regime under the single rubric of "fascist" so it seems clear that it is the accepted wisdom that all four regimes were basically similar and differed only in matters of detail. Anyone who knows even a little of the history of the period concerned, however, must realize how far from the truth this is. The feudal warlords of Japan, the antisemitic socialist of Germany, the Catholic monarchist of Spain and the pragmatic socialist of Italy were in fact really united over only one thing: Their dislike of Lenin and Stalin's Communism and "Bolshevism" generally. There clearly is some need, therefore, for us to look at what Mussolini and the Fascists really were and did.

The reality

In what follows, facts that should be easily checkable in popular encyclopaedias and textbooks will not be referenced. Less well-known facts, however, will be referenced. History is of course written by the victors and most summaries of historical Fascism are therefore written from a very anti-Fascist perspective so care is normally needed to tease out the facts behind the interpretations and value-judgments. That will attempted here.

Read the whole thing...

This from the Dissecting-leftism Blog at Men's News Daily:

Top writer admits to Nazi past
Correspondents in Berlin
August 14, 2006

IT'S enough to make an old man cry. Just days before publication of his long-awaited autobiography entitled Peeling the Onion, Gunter Grass, bleeding-heart figurehead of the German Left, has confessed he was once a member of the Nazi SS.

The revelation by the Nobel prize winner, now approaching his 80th birthday, has shocked Germany's literary and cultural world. It was Grass first and foremost who insisted the Germans "come clean" about their history and that his own generation should not try to pose as "victims" of Hitler's National Socialist ideology.

Now the great advocate of facing unpalatable truths has lived up to his own standards, but a little late.

The revelation came in an interview with Germany's respected conservative newspaper Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, and while it is certain to boost interest in his forthcoming autobiography it has done immeasurable harm to the writer's squeaky-clean reputation.

Grass now says that, although he had told the truth to his wife, those he deceived included his own children and his biographer Michael Jurgs, with whom he spent countless hours apparently going over the minutiae of his life in the latter years of the Third Reich.

Jurgs said yesterday: "I'm deeply disappointed. If he had come clean earlier and said he was in the SS at 17 no one would have cared, but now it puts in doubt from a moral point of view anything he has ever told us."

It had long been known that Grass, who was only 18 when the war ended, had served in the armed forces and been wounded. But until now he had gone along with the story that he had been drafted into an anti-aircraft unit in his native Danzig.

The truth, he now admits, is that he volunteered to join the U-boat fleet, "which was every bit as crazy", but was turned down and drafted instead into the 10th SS Panzer Division "Frundsberg", part of the Waffen SS.

"By that stage," he insists, "the SS were taking anybody they could lay their hands on." He escaped lifelong identification as an SS member only because by late 1944 the regiments were no longer organised enough to carry out the customary process of tattooing conscripts' blood groups on their arms.

Again from Mens News Daily:

China’s Coming Collapse A Danger To Us All
August 19, 2006
By Warner Todd Huston

One of the things that added to the collapse of the Soviet Union, though, was internal corruption, something that the U.S.A. had nothing to do with. The long lines that Soviet citizens stood in daily just to find necessities like bread and toilet paper should never be forgotten. Yet, as the lines lengthened, Party bigwigs spent their days idling away the hours at seaside resorts and gouging themselves on caviar and fine wines while the rest starved and did without. This was an intolerable situation in a society that claimed total “equality”. Apparently, some were more “equal” than others in the “worker’s paradise”.

Corruption, bribery, and chronic inefficiency all added to the collapse of the Soviets. But Soviet corruption was bush league compared to the level that Chinese corruption has reached. And that corruption will lead to China’s implosion.

But, will that implosion occur before China launches a war against the US? That is the question that is difficult to answer. But one thing is sure, China cannot advance, China will never join the rest of the world with democratic inspired government, nor will China be a healthy nation for its endemic corruption.

This from the Grand Forks Hearld via Mens News Daily:

State wants to protect revenue stream
By Don Mathis

SHERMAN, Texas - The forces that are lining up against North Dakota's Shared Parenting Initiative have two things in common: lack of logic and lust for lucre.

For example, Herald columnist Lloyd Omdahl writes, "Dr. Diane Lye said that the single most important determinant of a child's well-being after divorce is living in a household with adequate income" . Does this mean if Dad makes more money than Mom, he should have custody?

This from Mens News Daily:

Today, Oak Park Village conspires to retain its distinction as “sexiest suburb” by taking steps to ensure that all those fat people the anti-obesity racket has labeled “unsightly and unattractive” use these facilities at a minimum. What is to prevent them from banning such people all together?

Don’t laugh. Shu Bartholomew hosts an informative webcast called “On The Commons Radio” that catalogs episode after episode the abuses of power and unbelievable petty bylaws endemic to the system of homeowner associations sweeping across the United States like a plague of locusts devouring all the liberties stranded in their path.

On her guest appearance on Freedom 21 Santa Cruz, another eye opening broadcast warning of the dangers of contemporary community planning and the like, Shu detailed the plight of one homeowner that had to have the family dog weighed periodically to ensure that the canine did not go a few ounces over the weight stipulated for pets in the residential association regulations.

What is to stop a similar law or regulation from being promulgated that people over a certain size are not permitted to live in a particular housing development? Ridiculous, those of limited perspective might snap.

But is it? Already various community development authorities are manipulating the rules of the game to attract the kinds of people they want to allow into their own little versions of utopia.

This from Physorg:


Suicide is the 11th leading cause of death in the United States with 11 suicide deaths per 100,000 Americans.

For white males over the age of 65, the rate is almost triple that figure.

White males are more than eight times as likely to kill themselves as women of the same age and the risk increases as they get older, the Chicago Sun-Times reports.