Nifongs Legacy
While over at MND I browsed the articles of Carey Roberts and saw this piece:
Soon after prosecutor Michael Nifong was disbarred by the North Carolina Bar Association, the National District Attorneys Association issued its take on the case. “Nifong’s case is rarer than human rabies,” claimed Joshua Marquis, vice president of the group. “The defense bar is piling on and trying to claim this is typical behavior,” he bitterly complained.
So was Michael Nifong merely a “rogue” prosecutor, a feckless bad-apple amidst a scented orchard of ethical and civic-minded district attorneys?
and in the comments section:
false rape/false domestic violence figures are the backbone of feminist anti male hysteria!!
I myself was falselly accussed of rape, and the girl was never prosecuted..
The national district attotneys association will not change it's toon, unless under extreme pressure from the falselly accussed!!
RADAR did an interesting piece on this phenomena, and the district attorneys that play off the hysteria to get allected.
I would also encourage those that have been falselly accussed to visit john dias website.." Don't make her mad .com" And get youre story on record!!
also:
I think it boils down to prosecutors are beholding to PC now, above all else, because being PC gets them more money than being ethical or honest. The Duke case was eventually an exception because of the media spotlight, and people don't really believe guilt and innocence should be based on race and gender as PC proclaims.
It is now better to prosecute ten innocent men than to prosecute one guilty woman. Prosecuting ten innocent men now passes as "tough on crime" whereas prosecuting one guilty woman, especially if the prosecutor is male, just makes him a "bully". Remember, women are victims, men are perpetrators, and those are the only releveant facts in the farcical joke our judiciary has become.
Go into any courtroom in America today, and the worst criminal in the room will be the judge, followed by the prosecutor, followed by the defense attorney. As we become more "progressive", the accuser is more likely a criminal than the defendant, particularly when the accuser is female and/or non-white and the accused is male and/or white.
Nifong was just doing what any other prosecutor would have done in his shoes, i.e. take the side of the black female over the white males. It even got him re-elected, with the full support of the "gang of 88" racist, sexist, prejudice-loving professors. We're to the point now that if a prosecutor isn't anti-male, that means he is sexist. If he isn't anti-white, he's a racist.
It's even worse in "civil courts", especially "family law", where women are victims, fathers are de facto criminals, and truth, justice, and children are irrelevant.
Doubt my word? Allright then, show me a case since PC took over where a white man falsely accused three innocent black women and the prosecutor had evidence of the women's innocence but witheld it and prosecuted anyhow. It's more likely you will find a case where the women were truly guilty and the man was totally honest, but such evidence was suppressed and the man was prosecuted for making false charges.
and:
and:
-
so when does Crystal Mangrum go to jail?
why can't common citizens DEMAND that she be prosecuted?
after all - SHE BROKE THE LAW!when the police and judges blatantly look the other way, in front of the entire nation, where is the outrage?
and:
-
DcFather said,
"Nifong was just doing what any other prosecutor would have done in his shoes, i.e. take the side of the black female over the white males."
DcFather,
It is unfortunate situations like these have to be framed in only racial terms. As a black man who was also falsely & outrageously accused of (spousal) rape, abuse towards our daughter and domestic violence beatings on a daily basis for 29 years, I foolishly believed the "Innocent until PROVEN guilty" propaganda when I got to have my day in court! However, I was rudely awakened to the fact that LIES, DECEPTION and MANIPULATION are important tools used throughout our so-called "?justice?" system by those employed in the abuse indu$try. If one were to go to the Innocence project website and review each case, I would dare say that at least 50% percent of the "victims" of the AmeriKan justice system are black.
http://www.innocenceproject.org/
This case could have easily been framed as rich vs poor with an opportunistic Nifong using it as a vehicle to additionally inflame racial animosity and get re-elected. Tactics similarly employed by Sharpton & Jackson in order to achieve their goals. I wholeheartedly agree with your observation of who the real criminals are in the courtroom (judge, prosecutor and defense attorney). After the trial or hearing they all meet in the judge's chambers or the local bar to have a drink and a hearty laugh at those who foolishly believe justice is blind!
Your other point of prosecuting ten innocent men rather than one guilty woman should be expanded to 100 men. I believe it is totally about gender …all women= GOOD! all men=BAD! Just ask the leading male feminist, Joe Biden.
I'll be posting more on this notorious case of injustice later.
S Baker said,
This isn't all about the woman folks. Nifong merely used this disgusting slut to gain political traction, or so he thought. No, Nifong's case was not rare, but closer to the norm when it comes to dishonest lawyers. Master Edwards is just a high profile example of a lawyer making millions off of bogus charges of physician induced disease. Another example was the tobacco settlement in Florida under the Clinton rule, when 12 lawyers shared 11 BILLION in legal fees for determining that tobacco causes ill health; a malady noted since the 1920s. Estimates range from 10-20%, the amount of funds lawyers suck out of health care.