Feminism is when Nature tells you to take a hike
Reposting a classic from the dormant "Ranting of a Young Man In A Feminized Society" blog:
Feminism - Nature tells you to take a hike!!
Saturday, April 29, 2006
Much to the chagrin of feminists, nature has a way of kicking them in the ass. All the lies they perpetuate cannot fool nature. They can delude themselves into thinking that 50 is the new 30, but let's see those 50 yr olds, I mean "30" yr olds bear children. Feminism by nature is self delusion, they want to believe that they are being held back by the "patriachy". They want to believe that old women are sexy. They want to believe that obese women (BBW's) are just as desirable as fit women. They want to believe that they can do anything a man can do. They want to believe that they can surpass men in any arena. They want to believe that a woman can give birth at anytime and a biological clock does not exist. They want to believe that men are not necessary. They want to believe that they can fight wars with the best hardened male soldiers. In fact, they want to be men.
Is it any wonder why lesbians use strap-ons/dildos and other phallic shaped objects to make love to each other? Why do they need to do that? Surely the woman wearing the strap-on feels nothing whatsoever. A dildo is not part of her being. Perhaps it has nothing to do with what she feels, but how she acts. She wants to be a man, she wants to be in the drivers seat, she wants that dominant position, she wants to feel what it's like to fuck a woman, so she dons the attire of male virility, a kick ass penis. Too bad her's is made of plastic. She will never get that univeral orgasmic pleasure that men worldwide get when they are with a woman, she can simulate it to the best of her ability, but she will fail.
And that's exactly what feminism is, simulating masculinity, but they have failed in every category. Now, an honorable person would accept defeat and recognize their failures, but there is no honor in feminism.
Instead, they change the rules to suit them at any given opportunity, so they can turn their failures to victories. Their rules are not iron clad or written in stone, they change on a whim based on the situation. For instance, the belief that they can run with the best of the best in the military. They can't!! Almost all women are unable to meet the physical requirements necessary to get into the military in the first place. So they simply changed the rules. They reduced the workload and requirements for women. No more of that running a mile rubbish and pushups etc. Who needs physicality when you are a soldier? So now they celebrate that finally, women have broken into the military. How is it a victory if you rigged the results?
And how does having a bunch of inferior weaklings help the military? You can use this scenario on anything with feminists "breaking the glass ceiling". They change the rules to suit their needs and universally, when they change the rules, it's never to increase the standards, it's always to lower them. By demanding that the standards be lowered, aren't they more or less admitiing that they are in fact not up to snuff for the tasks at hand, and that yes, men are indeed better suited for those roles? Logically, that makes sense, but logic is a realm that is never roamed by the typical feminist. They might fool their fellow women and pussified males, but they ain't fooling nature.
Post a Comment