The Hate Mongers
It's an article I copied from another anti-feminist site here's a small excerpt:
Today's working women are more likely to buy clothes than make them, and to buy prepared food and restaurant meals rather than cook their own. Further, working women need more clothes, cars and services than women who stay home, thus creating more consumption for the business community and more taxes for government.
As women were encouraged to either not marry or to break up existing marriages they even increased the need for living space, because men and women who need only one apartment as a couple need two if they live apart.
Lawyers, real estate agents, "therapists" and psychiatrists benefited from the break-up of families, there were more jobs for social and child care workers and other government employees, and the whole new industry of day-care for children was established. Partly because mothers who did not care for their own kids felt guilty and partly because kids who were not cared for by their mothers were more demanding, sales of toys soared.
Business also benefited in several ways from the "meat rack" bars that opened as meeting places for singles. One was the business of the bars, of course, and another from the liquor and food sold and consumed there.
More important was the need by both men and women for expensive and impressive cars to drive to the bars where they hoped to pick up dates, and for clothes to wear. The mating period, when both men and women do their best to look impressive, was extended indefinitely.
And the flood of working women put a cap on wages. Whether they were paid as much as men or not the new workers increased the size of the work force, thus creating unemployment and a lever to keep wages down. That's one of the reasons the average Canadian has lost about 20% of real purchasing power since the mid-1970's.
But bringing women into the work force did not increase production. For all the talk about women being the same as men most women did not look for jobs in factories in mines or on construction. They wanted to be lawyers or media personalities or bureaucrats.
In a world that accepts Marshall's fallacy those are considered to be productive jobs and governments responded to the demand by creating some jobs and the need for others.
If you like to download this article in pdf format just click the link below:
http://tinyurl.com/6zjeo6
Post a Comment