Changed the layout again

I just changed the layout of this blog for I think the 4th time, however this one might be permanent. I saw that the links I posted were clipped by the links and other material on the side of the blog.

So now all of the extra stuff is at the bottom of the page and not blocking any of the post.

Now it's just like one great big web page.

I hope that this will be better for the readers of this blog and you'll be able to reap the full benifits of being able to see all of the information posted here.

Well that's it for now. Thanks for visiting and good night...

Privacy and Anonymity

As a MRA blogger keeping you real identity hidden from others is an aboslute must. But how to go about doing that is the question. The obvious part is the user name or pen name that you'll be using to blog with.

If you're the creative kind then you probably don't need any help in that department. However, for others who may get stuck at this point here are some tips. First off, if you can try not to pick an obvious name like Indiana Jones, or Homer Simpson, or other well-known famous characters.

Pick names from lesser-known films or fiction books.

If that don't work then there is always the online name generators:


http://www.bannerblog.com.au/2007/03/mini_action_name_generator.php

http://noemata.net/nbng/

http://www.myprecious.us/name_generator.php

http://www.fakenamegenerator.com/

http://gangstaname.com/

http://www.chriswetherell.com/hobbit/

http://www.rinkworks.com/namegen/

http://rumandmonkey.com/widgets/toys/namegen/

Okay, next you need to know about anonymous browsing. The best thing you can do is use something like

Incognito:

http://www.patdouble.com/content/blogsection/3/6/

It's a live operating system that runs directly from the computers cd tray. The only thing with Tor is if you use it to do a lot of searching then you may find yourself blocked from certain search engines, this is why I don't use it.

Just pick something from one of these links and use it when you want to do your posting to the internet:

http://www.debianhelp.co.uk/debian.htm

http://www.frozentech.com/content/livecd.php

http://www.linuxbasis.com/distributions.html

http://lwn.net/Distributions

http://www.securedvd.org/

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_LiveDistros

http://www.linux.org/dist/



Now you need to find some hosting. Unfortunately at this time there doesn't seem to be many options. But I do have 3 host (besides blogger and wordpress) that can be used:

https://www.nearlyfreespeech.net

http://yohost.org/

http://www.cotse.net/

and here you can find a few more tools, more on how to protect yourself, and also what you can and cannot do as a cyber activist:


http://web.media.mit.edu/~nicholas/Wired/WIRED6-10.html

How Tor works:

http://tor.eff.org/overview.html

Anonymizer's Anonymous Surfing:

http://www.anonymizer.com/anonymizer2005/1.5/

A list of fired bloggers:

http://morphemetales.blogspot.com/2004/12/statistics-on-fired-bloggers.html

The Bloggers' Rights Blog:

http://rights.journalspace.com/

A Technical Guide to Anonymous Blogging (An Early
Draft), by Ethan Zuckerman:

http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/globalvoices/?p=125

EFF's Legal Guide for Bloggers, a larger, more
comprehensive look at the legal issues facing
bloggers:

http://www.eff.org/bloggers/lg/


http://www.torproject.org/

http://w2.eff.org/bloggers/lg/faq-privacy.php

http://www.pcmesh.com/anonymous-surfing-faq.htm

http://www.anonymousspeech.com/

http://www.uow.edu.au/arts/sts/bmartin/dissent/documents/defamation.html

http://www.uni-giessen.de/faq/archiv/net-anonymity.part1-4/msg00001.html

http://faqs.org/popular/popular1.html

http://faqs.org/faqs/faqsearch.html

http://www.anonymousspeech.com/anonymous_payment.aspx

http://www.chillingeffects.org/johndoe/faq.cgi

http://w2.eff.org/Privacy/Anonymity/blog-anonymously.php

http://www.freeproxy.ru/#english

http://www.shadowbrowser.com/

http://www.katzglobal.com/hosting/hosting.html

http://www.faqs.org/faqs/privacy/anon-server/faq/use/part1/

http://blog.wired.com/business/2007/07/newbies-guide-t.html

http://www.mutemail.com/anonymous-email-service-faq.html

http://gentoo-wiki.com/HOWTO_Anonymity_with_Tor_and_Privoxy

http://wiki.noreply.org/noreply/TheOnionRouter/TorFAQ

http://law.fordham.edu/publications/articles/200flspub6717.pdf

http://www.nodezilla.net/install_guide.html

http://www.iusmentis.com/technology/remailers/index-penet.html

http://www.mit.edu/activities/safe/fighting-back/anonymous-remailer-faq

http://www.google.com/Top/Computers/Internet/E-mail/Anonymous_Mailers/

http://www.faqs.org/faqs/by-newsgroup/alt/alt.privacy.html

http://www.anonymitychecker.com/faq.html

http://www.my-proxy.com/

http://www.openssh.com/

http://www.offshore.com.ai/security/

http://maildropguide.com/

http://www.perfectlyprivate.com/

http://network-tools.com/

http://privacysig.com/

http://privacy.net/

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proxy_server

http://www.s-mail.com/

http://blacklogic.com/

http://www.openprivacy.org/

http://www.stayinvisible.com/

http://www.anonymize.net/faq.html

http://pps.nntime.com/faq.html

http://www.hackerz.ir/e-books/remailer.html

http://mixmaster.sourceforge.net/faq.shtml

http://www.spywarewarrior.com/uiuc/info20b.htm

http://www.cyberslapp.org/about/page.cfm?PageID=7

https://www.kuro5hin.org/story/2002/12/10/213152/57

http://www.inetprivacy.com/a4proxy/a4p_support.htm

http://www.ibiblio.org/pub/academic/communications/cmc-list/internet-cmc

http://www.globalvoicesonline.org/advocacy/anonymous-blogging-with-tor/

http://www.google.com/Top/Society/Issues/Human_Rights_and_Liberties/Privacy/

http://www.google.com/Top/Computers/Security/Internet/Privacy/

http://www.google.com/Top/Computers/Security/Internet/Privacy/Products_and_Tools/Free/

http://www.google.com/Top/Computers/Security/Products_and_Tools/Cryptography/

http://www.google.com/Top/Computers/Security/Internet/Privacy/Products_and_Tools/

http://www.w3.org/Security/Faq/www-security-faq.html

http://www.andrebacard.com/privacy.html

http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Bay/9648/pgut-links.html

Here are some newsgroups you can subscribe to:

sci.crypt, comp.society.privacy, alt.privacy, sci.answers, comp.answers

alt.answers, news.answers

alt.privacy, alt.privacy.anon-server

Along with THIS post you should now have all of the knowledge necessary to do some anonomus activism.

Thanks for reading and good luck...

The 20th Century Anti-Suffrage Movement

I've decided to fire a few show over the bow before Christmas I wanted to post a little something about the early 20th Century anti-feminst movement. Some of you probably didn't even know that there was and anti-femist movement way back then, well there was.

They spanned the lenght of the country from New York to Nebraska to Missouri and probably a number of other places in between, only back then it was known as the anti-suffrage movement becuase women didn't yet have the right to vote.

Without further adieu here are the links:

http://preview.tinyurl.com/hkfp7


http://www.thelizlibrary.org/suffrage/booklist.htm


http://teacher.scholastic.com/activities/suffrage/history.htm

http://www.mainememory.net/bin/Detail?ln=5470

http://www.history.rochester.edu/class/suffrage/home.htm

http://preview.tinyurl.com/2twra9

http://www.archives.gov/education/lessons/woman-suffrage/ny-petition.html

http://www.hsd.org/Women_AntiSuffragist_Thompson.htm

http://www.salzburgseminar.org/ASC/csacl/progs/reform/suffragists.htm


http://www.aspenhistory.org/antisuf.html


http://www.tsl.state.tx.us/exhibits/suffrage/victory/dandyhubby.html

http://www.elections.org.nz/study/history/history-anti-suffrage.html

http://hdl.loc.gov/loc.rbc/rbcmil.scrp6005403

http://www.jsu.edu/depart/english/robins/waysta/way02tpb.htm

http://hdl.loc.gov/loc.rbc/rbcmil.scrp1009301

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-suffragism

http://preview.tinyurl.com/36t8he

http://www.johndclare.net/Women1_ArgumentsAgainst.htm

http://www.gutenberg.org/etext/7300

http://www.tsha.utexas.edu/handbook/online/articles/TT/vbtvw.html

http://www.scc.rutgers.edu/njwomenshistory/Period_4/antisuffrage.htm

http://www.theatlantic.com/issues/03sep/0309suffrage.htm

http://www.ioba.org/newsletter/archive/v13/rd1.php


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Women%27s_National_Anti-Suffrage_League

http://www.historycooperative.org/journals/ht/37.2/sparacino.html

http://teachpol.tcnj.edu/amer_pol_hist/thumbnail309.html

http://lcweb2.loc.gov/ammem/vfwhtml/vfwhome.html


http://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/keller-helen/works/1910s/13_10_17.htm

http://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/keller-helen/bio/fbi-file.pdf

http://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/keller-helen/index.htm

http://www.tcr.org/tcr/essays/CB_Female_Suffrage.pdf

http://dpsinfo.com/women/history/timeline.html

http://www.42explore2.com/suffrage.htm

http://www.primaryresearch.org/suffrage/

http://winningthevote.org/res_anti.html

http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/SUanti.htm

http://dwardmac.pitzer.edu/anarchist_archives/goldman/aando/suffrage.html


http://www.spub.ksu.edu/ISSUES/v100/FA/n005/cam-suffrage-riley.html

http://www.firstworldwar.com/source/us19thamendment.htm

http://preview.tinyurl.com/8v84

http://www.ronaldbrucemeyer.com/rants/0604almanac.htm


http://preview.tinyurl.com/3x2vct


http://www.fact-index.com/w/wo/women_s_suffrage.html


http://www.marxist.com/womenandmarxism.asp


http://www.pinn.net/~sunshine/4dads/4dads5.html

http://1912.history.ohio-state.edu/suffrage/newpage7.htm

http://1912.history.ohio-state.edu/suffrage/SocPlatformSuffrage.htm

http://1912.history.ohio-state.edu/suffrage/Consequences.htm

http://1912.history.ohio-state.edu/suffrage/workingwomen.htm

http://www.newsoftheweird.com/cgi-bin/search/newsweird.cgi?query=gable&num=1



-------------------------

Take this post with you. Then go here and type in the link to this post and have it sent you the email address or your choice:

Free Pdf Convert

http://www.freepdfconvert.com/

UK Mens Issues Activist Needed for TV Show

This from Angry Harry's activism page (link):


UK MRAs wanted for TV programme ...

Dear Harry,

I apologise for contacting you out of the blue but I am researching a new TV programme and wondered if you could help...

I am hoping to make a new programme about people who feel a sense of dislike towards, or are uncomfortable with, members of the opposite sex and/or gender-specific movements (feminism etc).

As one of the most-linked anti-feminist bloggers, [did he say 'one of the most-linked anti-feminist bloggers'? Huh! This man needs a lesson or two on how to flatter far more effusively a man of my most magnificent stature!] I wondered if you could write a piece on your blog about what I'm looking for and encourage people to get involved.

andy.cadman at endemoluk.com

Many thanks and I hope to hear from you soon.

Andy

So, there you go, Boys - and Girls. Here is your chance to let rip and have a really good moan about all those horrible feminist wimmin out there. Show them no mercy. Eat them alive. Squash 'em like pesky bugs.

Rip out their throats. Stomp on their heads. And then whack their behinds till they blister and burn.

Saw them in half. Boil them in oil. Pulverise them with ...

Goodness, I don't know what came over me.

I feel faint.

But, before I pass out, if you've got nothing better to do - and, let's face it, if you're hanging around here then you clearly have got nothing better to do - then email Andy and check out the angles.

Print A Blog

Just found two new resources that might be useful to readers here:


Shared Book Blog Printing

Allows you to print blogs just like a book and take it with you.

http://blogger.sharedbook.com/

HP Smart Web Printing

Allows you to turn any web site into pdf(s) file(s).

http://h71036.www7.hp.com/hho/cache/482779-0-0-225-121.html

Operation Intense Thunder under way

Before I took my break in late 2006 I was going to keep a list of both Male friendly and anti-male businesses. This list has now been updated and is available HERE.

On the list of Male Friendly Businesses:

http://www.asda.com/

http://www.topman.com

http://www.oliversweeney.com/

http://www.hahaonline.co.uk/home.asp

http://uk.virginmoney.com/cancer-cover/bigvevents/

http://www.virgindigital.com/

Morphy Richards

http://www.keepyoureyeontheball.org/

http://www.theboodles.com/

http://www.labseriesformen.co.uk/

http://www.ultimategolfchallenge.co.uk/

http://www.cathaypacific.com/

http://www.cartridges4causes.co.uk/

http://www.officegreen.co.uk/

http://www.magictaxi.co.uk/default.aspx?ck=icr

Lloyd's TSB

http://www.lge.com/

http://www.smirnoff.com/

http://www.smirnoffice.com/


So go check them out, and if you like what they have to offer even if it's just a key chain please buy it from them and support their business...

Thanks!

Update:

I forgot some:


Ray Mears
http://www.raymears.com/

Delta (Airlines)
http://www.delta.com/

United (Airlines)
www.united.com/

New Immigration Link - Happier Abroad

Several weeks ago I posted a rough Immigration guide. Here is one link that I forgot to post:

Happier Abroad

http://www.happierabroad.com/ebook/Contents.htm

Road to Heterophobia

I just found another article from my old notes I'm going to post here that seem ironically timely in light of the latest advice from father's rights activist Dr. Stephen Baskerville, Ph.D. not to marry or have children .

I think it's important to give readers as many pieces of the puzzle as to how we've reached this point as I can. So without further ado an article from Dr. Daphne Patai "The Road To Heterophobia":


http://www.mens-network.org/
The Road to Heterophobia
An IWF [http://www.iwf.org] Speakers Series featuring author Daphne Patai


I have read a great deal about sexual harassment law-"how to" books written for policy-makers and administrators and colleges and workplaces. And I have been astonished to find that, far from the kind of thoughtful, serious consideration that I thought the problem merited, what I very quickly recognized in those readings-since I was trained as a literary critic-was their highly contentious, rhetorical browbeating. The gist of the rhetoric was that sexual harassment is a terrible evil akin to rape. Very often commentators would begin: "Like rape, sexual harassment is an ignored problem. Like rape, women are ashamed to come forward and describe their experiences." And so on.


Instead of taking it for granted, as readers were obviously meant to, I said to myself, "Ah, inflammatory analogies. That's the technique here." Our brains were being invited to flip over the differences between sexual harassment and rape and to see them all as one thing.



I got interested in how something becomes classified as a social problem. Clearly that was what was being done with sexual harassment. It had become a social problem, not because it was suddenly so devastating, but because there was a group of people who had starting agitating about it.



I turned to the work of a very interesting sociologist, Joel Best, who wrote a book called, Threatened Children, in which he talked about the social construction of child abuse as a problem. What I learned from Best was that there's a predictable process by which a group of claims-makers sets forth a problem and brings it to public attention. There are a series of stages through which the public becomes aware of the problem and begins to accept the terms of the debate as set forth by this group of claims-makers.



They engage in a series of techniques, what Best calls "expansion of the domain of the problem." The public is told that it's not simply a specific problem occurring in a specific setting, but that it's a much broader problem. That way it tends to escape from its borders, so that we become aware that the problem is much, much larger than we thought.



For example, sexual harassment was originally understood as quid pro quo ("this for that"), in other words, sexual extortion. But it has now moved into the realm of hostile work environment. And it isn't just relationships in which there are power discrepancies-a powerful employer who has coercive power over an employee. It's now also a whole range of other things, such as harassment between equals, about which the Supreme Court made a decision in May.



We have ended up with a mish-mash of unclear categories. If we look at the definitions of sexual harassment as they are written into specific policies, we find that they're anything from a look to rape: unwanted touching, looks, jokes, or repeated invitations. The law has accommodated this sensitivity on the part of women to a really phenomenal extent.



I use the term "heterophobia" in my book because I feel that it captures in a nutshell the key problem that is driving a great deal of the legislation about sexual harassment. It is also driving the non-lawyers who are supporting this legislation and who are attempting to implement sexual harassment policies in universities. The trainers, the policy makers, the counselors-the sexual harassment industry-is by now a very large money-making part of our society.



Antagonism Toward Men



I'm aware that there are many feminists and many feminisms. However, there is also an identifiable trend within feminism of antagonism toward men and male heterosexuality above all. There is a fear of heterosexuality, male heterosexuality in particular, and sometimes the heterosexuality of other women.



As I was reading more and more of the sexual harassment industry literature, these how-to books, I became aware of the presuppositions that underlie these texts. And, this is where I have to be careful not to sound loony because I start sounding as if I think there's a plot out there to abolish heterosexuality. It's really rather funny because, I don't for a moment believe there's a chance in hell that would succeed.



But that already tells you something about what I do believe. I believe that heterosexuality is natural. Isn't that what everyone thinks? Well, no. Within women's studies and feminism what you learn is something else. You learn about the social construction of heterosexuality, what Adrienne Rich called "compulsory heterosexuality." Following this are the types of [negative] attitudes toward men expressed by Andrea Dworkin in very vulgar language and by Catharine MacKinnon in much more eloquent language. We have scholars such as Marilyn Frye, a professor of women's studies at Michigan State University who says women are "rigorously required to be sexual with and for men."



There is a new book called The Houghton Mifflin Reader's Companion to U.S. Women's History. By its title, you would expect it to be a normal kind of book that anybody could pick up. This is what the entry under "heterosexuality" says: "Sexuality is not private, but is political and related to power. 'Compulsory heterosexuality' is part of a power structure benefiting heterosexual males at the expense of women and homosexuals. This inequity is justified by an ideology that sees heterosexuality as natural, universal and biologically necessary and homosexuality as the opposite. The system also is reinforced by legal sanctions and violence against women (rape, battering, incest, and murder) and against lesbians, gays, and transgendered persons (verbal harassment, physical assault and murder)." This is the definition of heterosexuality that has found its way into a standard reference work by a major publisher!



I've documented many, many cases of what sound like lunatic statements made by feminists about the unnaturalness of heterosexuality. Some of the more mellow people say you can't blame a woman for having been heterosexual in the past, because after all she was trained to it, but now that she hears what we have to say, she certainly is responsible for the decisions she makes in the future. So, in other words, heterosexuality is obviously not the thing she should be choosing.



I conclude from all of this, that there is antagonism to heterosexuality within the women's movement. Now, this isn't news. It's just that feminists have spent so much time pretending this isn't true and insisting that the accusations against them of "male bashing" was just backlash against feminists.



They claim it's a misrepresentation of feminism, but it's not a misrepresentation. As someone who spent 10 years in women's studies, I know that male bashing has always been a very important part of feminism.



This mindset, which has shaped so much public discourse today, has found its way into law. I call it feminist extremism. The language used by feminist extremists has become so ubiquitous that it is very difficult for reasonable people to frame arguments in something other than that language.



I believe heterophobia has played a tremendously strong role in making people accept some truly dreadful laws and policies. Sexual harassment law is a very good case. The problem with the extension of sexual harassment from quid pro quo harassment to hostile environment, is that no one really knows exactly what that is. Sexual harassment legislation is an instrument by which the micromanagement of everyday life is being undertaken. The real aim is to change the relations between men and women in a fundamental way.



Why? Who benefits from this? The only people are those radical extremists who want to disrupt male and female interactions, and they have done just that in the workplace, the colleges, the high schools, the grade schools, and even the kindergartens. Everybody is now on notice. And, it's not for nothing. As Catharine MacKinnon said in 1986 when hostile work environment was established as a type of sexual harassment, "We made this law up from the beginning and now we've won."



Daphne Patai, Ph.D., is professor of Brazilian literature at the University of Massachusetts at Amherst.

Confessions of a Pick Up Artist

So you think that sweet lil' thang your with now isn't capable of cheating on you. Did she tell you some lie about how she'd never run around on you and that the two of you would be together for a long time?


The truth is that before she comes home from work she **could be** off doing another man in the parking lot of the building where she works..

She could be at a motel doing the vertical mambo with some playa.

She could be even polishing the knob of one of her co-workers....


Don't believe me, then read this old post from FM Watkins previous blog "Another Day In The Jungle":



View original post here.

This post was not written by me. It was written by a PUA (pickup artist) and he explains how women so easily fall for his bullshit. It's a bit sad but it shows how gullible they are.

------------------------------

A straight-talking post that was controversially posted across half of usenet in 2003.

I wasn't a sexist before I understood women. There was a time when I was blissfully ignorant. I grew up watching Disney cartoons, I believed in romance and "true love conquers all" etc. I wanted to find a woman who could be my equal, my partner. I believed in finding that one true love and being committed to each other forever. You know, like in the marriage vows, "for better or for worse, through sickness and in health, for richer or for poorer" etc. And I believed that women basically wanted the same thing. Now I understand that this was only possible when society was structured to enforce it. Now that women are "liberated" (and thus at the mercy of their own emotions and baser instincts) this is mostly no longer possible in today's society. Victorian society, or many Arab societies, are examples of how society used to be structured to keep women as faithful as possible.




I'd like to point out that I am not a misogynist...I love women. But I AM a sexist, in the sense that I believe women are vastly different than men and, according to the standards that men hold for other men, women are inferior as well.




I must be a bitter loser, right? In fact, I enjoy more success with women than most of the men in this city. I have slept with over 200 women in my life. I am sleeping with 5 different women right now. They are all normal, healthy, well-adjusted, good-looking (8+ on the looks scale) professional women. (At least as normal and healthy and well-adjusted as women can be - most women have issues.) But that's not all. I can go out any night of the week and pick up a woman. I can pick her up in front of all her friends (with 80% efficiency for each approach.) Women will slip me their phone number when their boyfriend is in the bathroom. I can talk to women on the street or in the grocery store and within 30 minutes, I can usually have sex with them right there in my car or get them back to my place. If I have to settle for a phone number, and I meet her on another day, assuming she doesn't flake, I WILL do her that next day.



Let me point out right now that my Modus Operandi doesn't change in the slightest if she single or if she has a boyfriend or husband. I just do my normal routine and I get her. Sometimes she brings up the boyfriend so she won't feel guilty when I've done her because now it's "my fault." Sometimes she hides it from me until after I've fucked her, then she admits it. I can't tell you how many times I've been laying next to some chick, all sweaty cause I just finished busting a nut all over her face or in her mouth or on her back, and suddenly her phone rings and she's on the phone with her man, giving him some bullshit story. This is with NO GUILT WHATSOEVER!!! The sweetest most innocent girls you ever laid eyes on, will cheat at the drop of a HAT. The one thing that most men value most - loyalty - is just not there with women. Women don't think in terms of honor, women don't say "word is bond;" women are basically emotionally driven. If they feel it, they do it, period. Then they rationalize it to themselves later. Nothing is more meaningful, or compelling, to a woman than (1) the way she feels and (2) learning more about her own inner self and having emotional realizations. That's why women love astrology, chick flicks, soap operas, stupid Cosmo quizes, other random bullshit topics that supposedly reveal info about yourself, etc.





I must be really good looking, right? NOPE. My looks are marginal; I'm maybe a 7. I don't work out (though I'm not fat or anything.) In fact I didn't have any success with women until I was in my early 20's. That's when I decided to go out a lot and start trying to get laid... I was willing to face rejection a thousand times a night, and do it over and over, trying everything, until I got it right. I had to completely set my ego aside. I didn't get laid at all for the first few months. Then every now and then. Then pretty often. Then downright consistently! I'm in my early 30's now and I am basically a sexual god. I wouldn't have even believed this were possible when I was in high school. The ONLY factor that determined whether a woman would cheat was my own skill level. When my skills were poor, women shit all over me. (Everyone knows how women think they have license to be rude bitches in social situations... in fact I understand and appreciate that behavior now.) But once my skills got good, I could just about anyone's wife or girlfriend. And many times I didn't know they had a man until after I fucked them.



Look, I'm not saying that men are perfect, or whatever. Far from it. I'm just saying, I've spent a lot of my time studying women and interacting with them, and I know how they are. In fact, sometimes I hate knowing it. Sometimes I wish I had taken the blue pill, and never went down the rabbit hole, because now there's really no going back. I didn't want to believe these things... but how could I ever get married now? How could I ever be the chump who pays for everything and blissfully goes through life not worrying about his woman because he trusts her? Look, would you leave your dog alone with a steak? You can't hate the dog for doing what's in its nature. You can't trust a dog, BUT you can trust a dog to BE a dog. Some men are disloyal... but I could *never* trust a woman to be loyal. Some men are bad presidents...but I could *never* vote for a woman to be president. I can rarely expect a woman to regard her own promises as more important and compelling to her than the emotions she feels in the moment. She will rationalize it to herself later.




Here's an interesting fact. Did you know that the median 22 year old woman has TWICE as much sex as the median 22 year old man? You might ask, how is that possible? If a woman's having sex, doesn't that mean a man is having sex at the same time? And thus, shouldn't men be having just as much sex as women? NO...because most men hardly get laid, or if they do, it's because they "got lucky." But a small group of men get laid ALL THE TIME, and with LOTS AND LOTS of women! It's evolution at work. Women follow their emotions, and that leads them to sleep with men like me (who know how to control female emotions.) Women want the top man...so the top man fucks lots of women. That's right - the sexual revolution, feminism, etc has resulted in a return to harems. Women, at the mercy of their own emotions, are volunteering for the modern-day equivalent of harems. Lucky for me!! Heh.



You might say, "But...but...I'm so nice! I'm a nice guy!" Guess what? That's like a fat chick saying, "But I'm so smart!" As if those things have anything in the world to do with sexual attraction!




I'm going to give some tips here for the poor sucker guys who are posting online trying to get laid and who are spending hundreds / thousands of dollars on all those whores out there without getting any play. (You bitches know exactly what you're doing, and I'm on to your game!)



* Don't be sexually judgemental in any way. A woman's worst fear is to be perceived as a slut. She will suck your toes and take it in the arse if she thinks you don't view her poorly for it (and she knows her friends won't find out.)



* Don't get angry at her. Women know they have emotional outbursts and they need to trust that you can handle that. It's ok (and necessary) to occasionally put your foot down...just make sure she knows you are fully in control of yourself.



* Don't let her manipulate you or control you in any way. She will immediately lose all respect for you. Always be leading. It's just like dancing - women hate a man who can't lead.



* When first approaching a woman or a group, they tend to get a feeling like this is just your little scheme to get close to them, when you really just want something from them - like sex. (And they're right.) It's important to structure your body language and conversation so that they honestly don't believe you want something from them. They should feel like you are about to leave at any second.




* DON'T TRY TO IMPRESS HER IN ANY WAY. Don't show off. Don't talk about accomplishments or possessions. As soon as she perceives that you are trying to prove yourself to her, she loses all interest.




* Don't ignore her friends. A woman values her friend's opinions more than just about anything else in the world. Nothing matters to her more than what other women are thinking. Give her friends lots of attention and get everyone laughing. If one woman is feeling different than the others, she will drag them away. They will follow like a flock of pigeons. Society is the book of women. (Notice that men do NOT behave this way! Women are very different!)



* To get a woman attracted / emotionally vulnerable, give her lots of emotions and feelings. Don't just make her feel good. Make her feel good, and angry, and sad, and connected, and astonished, and intrigued, etc. Make her laugh. Tease her. Tell stories about your sick puppy. Tell her why things would never work out between the two of you. Call her a dork. If she gets heated up, she will start touching you...playfully push her away. If she calls you a jerk and punches your arm, you are doing it right. If she gives you that "I can't believe you just said that" look, do NOT back down, do not say "Oh I'm just kidding" or anything like that.



* As she gets more emotional, she will try to ruin things by throwing in logic. She will ask you if you are a player, or if you say this to all the girls, or whatever. The trick is this: Don't take it seriously by giving it some logical answer! That's right...women lose interest if you take them seriously!!! It's crazy but that's how they behave. Just blow it off or misinterpret what she's saying as though she is coming on to you. If you fail these tests, she will be gone so fast your head will spin.



* She will start asking you lots of questions. This is what chicks do when they suddenly find themselves attracted to a man they know nothing about. This is your chance to open up a little and also find out more about her and build a deeper connection. You have to do this, or she will flake later (even if you've kissed her!) Women are the worst flakes in the world! Don't make it too easy for her, make her work for it a bit. Then talk about connections and childhood memories and things you have in common, etc. She needs to feel that this is genuine. This is usually the time when I throw in a few fake vulnerabilities, like pretending I'm shy or insecure about something. I know it's fucked up but women need to see that there are at least a few small holes where they can sink their hooks in you. They get uneasy if you are too perfect.



* Make sure she gets the feeling that you have standards and that you are judging her based on them. Ask her questions that show her you are checking her out to see if she is up to snuff. Women don't like to feel like you are with them only because you can't do any better. They prefer to feel like you have high standards; you can get any chick you want, but you chose HER because she is SOOOO special and SOOOO different from all the others. Yeah, I know.




* Move her to different locations. Take her next door for a drink. Take her across the street to check out some art. The more locations the better.




* Take responsibility for every escalation. A woman will do just about anything as long as she doesn't have to feel like it was "her fault." Make it YOUR fault. Make it "just happen." She will rationalize it to herself later using the same bullshit generator that women use to flake out on dates at the last minute. Don't get her horny until you get her isolated. Believe me, emotional is better than horny.



* Keep the woman always swinging somewhere between validation and rejection. If she feels rejected, she drops out or gets REALLY MAD. And if she feels too validated, she will ditch you in a heartbeat. So push her away (emotionally) and then pull her back in.



* BELIEVE YOUR OWN BULLSHIT. Chicks do not look at your excuses and try to see if they are bullshit or not... because that is the logical thing to do, and chicks are not logical. Rather, what they do is see if YOU seem to believe your own bullshit when you say it. If you look like you do, then chances are, they will believe it too. So the key is to believe your own bullshit, and other aspects about yourself that you want the chick to believe about you too (alpha male..whatever)... because your own self beliefs for some reason will automatically 'impart' to the chick!



* One more thing...many guys make the mistake of listening to female romantic advice. Don't listen to them, THEY DON'T KNOW WTF THEY ARE TALKING ABOUT, and they WILL steer you wrong. They will tell you what they THINK they want, instead of what they actually RESPOND to. And furthermore, a large part of the female sexual experience IS the inability to admit these things BECAUSE they derive sexual pleasure from putting up resistance and being overwhelmed.



If you do things this way, after a few months practice you WILL get laid like a rock star. The guys who get laid are the ones who know what they are doing, because they have practiced on lots of women. Ironically, women are most attracted to the men who are most likely to fuck them and then dump them on their arse - because those are precisely the men who have so many other options because they practice on lots of women. That's why you always hear women bitching about how men are arseholes that only want to them and dump them - because those are the men that they gravitate to.



Women tend to wise up when they get towards their 30s, and they start looking for a nice wimpy beta male to settle down with and pay for all their shit. As they get older, they will get more and more desperate to find this guy. Once they do, they will cheat on him with an exciting fun guy like me. (But who wants to some old chick in her 30's? That's what beta males are for! Heh)



(Sorry dude, but just in case you don't know guys like me are catching on to this and THERE WILL BE A SHORTAGE OF BETA MALES. It's called Men Going Their Own Way!!)


Hey, don't blame me - I didn't make things the way they are. I was just a guy who wanted to get laid. And I do.


--- Priceless!

Indeed..


































Fuckers and Suckers

The now defunct "Outcast Supestar" blog had a great article about how men are placed into two categories by women. Suckers and Fuckers:



After reading the nomarriage ebook, the author talks about two groups of men fuckers and suckers.

Keep in mind western women love excitement and hate boredom. When they are in their teens and early 20's they don't want stability that suckers have to offer because that is boring.

Keep in mind that women don't think for themselves but decisions on who they date or sleep with is usually made by the council not by the woman herself. This council is usually made up of her mother, sister, and friends etc. If dating a nice guy is not considered to be fun and popular by the "council" he is going to get snubbed.

There is another group of guys called fuckers. Women love to have sex with these guys during their prime years. Although they offer no stability to these women, however women will still sleep with them. The reason why women will is because they are unpredictable and therefore they are deemed as very exciting.

Once these women get to there late 20's - early 30's they will fraudulently sell their looks to suckers who make a good income in order to get married. In other words they will put on a pony show for them until they get the ring. After a few years of marriage, these women are going to get bored and everything is the suckers fault. They will look for affairs and cash out on their suckers knowing that they will get the house, child support (if they have children), and alimony. All she has to do is file a false abuse charge (no proof necessary) to make all this happen. Even as a bonus, the sucker even gets to pay for her attorney fees.

Also, remember guys a women's fertility starts to decline at age 27 not in her 30's and 40's. If any of you want to start a family I highly recommend to make sure that the woman you are going to start a family with is no older than 25.

Despite their not being any legal justice in this country, Mother Nature has a justice of her own.

Those suckers who once ached for these women will lose interest in them once they get to be in their mid to late 20's. The last thing they are going to find attractive are used up women in their late 20's-30's. In fact these women must be avoided at all cost. They got a disease called baby rabies. They are going to do everything possible to get pregnant and trap you into a long term relationship where they can get provided for.

However, once those "suckers" get financially stable they will get to travel to foreign countries and enjoy beautiful women. Also, while in the United States, they will have developed fun hobbies to do when they are not working. In fact these "suckers" will not have to deal with the stress of fear of divorce, a nagging whore, false abuse and rape chargers, get to keep their sanity and money, won't have to worry about raising kid that aren't theirs etc.

However, the women who neglected the “suckers” in favor of the “fuckers” during their prime years are going to have to face justice. It's not legal justice but Mother Nature justice. Once they get to their late 20's for every year a man ages, they will be aging by two years. They will wrinkle and get ugly very fast. Investing thousands of dollars in makeup in order to form a bond with a “sucker” is not going to get the job done because they failed to form a bond with a "sucker" during their prime years. Their biological clocks will be ticking and they will get very desperate. They are going to want to be talking care off, like living off a “sucker” so they won't have to work. Disgusted by their behavior, the "suckers" will not want anything to do with them and will rebuke them. They are going to have to work long hours for the rest of their life because they could not find a "sucker" to take care of them.

They will whine and complain that the "suckers" will not commit despite them snubbing them in favor of the "fuckers" during their prime years. They will rot all alone with no one to take care of them, many of them will not get to have children, and will be living very miserable lives until death all because they thought it was cute to let the "suckers" rot all alone while they go squander their prime years to the "fuckers."


That my friends is what I call justice!

We have rss





Just incase you didn't know I made an rss feed for this site that you can copy and paste into any feed reader:


RSS Feed
http://feeds.feedburner.com/UNotGonnaLikeThis

ATOM Feed
http://unotgonnalikethis.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default

I believe that the second feed is an atom feed. You might want to validate the feed first before trying to put it into your reader.

If I can remember to do so I'll put the links on the site later with buttons for visitors to get the feeds..

Translate Page Into Your Language

Image Hosted by UploadHouse.com



Image Hosted by UploadHouse.com









del.icio.us linkroll

Archive

Counter

Counter

web tracker

Widget

Site Meter

Blog Patrol Counter